Literature DB >> 7724394

Low incidence of lead related complications associated with nonthoracotomy implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems.

G J Fahy1, J M Kleman, B L Wilkoff, V A Morant, S L Pinski.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are increasingly being implanted without the need for thoracotomy. Long-term lead performance and stability were evaluated in 150 consecutive patients in whom 1 of 3 nonthoracotomy ICD lead systems was implanted over a 3-year period from September 1990.
RESULTS: Twelve (8%) patients (7 males, 5 females) experienced 13 lead complications during a follow-up period of 12 +/- 10 months. Complications were related to intracardiac leads in 7 (4 dislodgments, 2 fractures, 1 right ventricular perforation) and patch leads in 6 (2 folding, 1 fracture, 1 erosion, and 2 hematomas) cases. Freedom from lead related complications at 1 year was 92% (95% confidence interval, 86%-95%). A significant difference in freedom from lead complications between the two most frequently implanted lead systems was observed (P = 0.02). Complication rates were similar in the initial 75 and the more recent 75 implants (P = 0.5). The median time between lead implant and detection of complications was 37 days (range 3-1,147). Complications were diagnosed before hospital discharge in only two cases. In five patients, complications were asymptomatic and in three of these, reoperation was required due to inadequate defibrillation thresholds. Reoperation was necessary in 9 of 12 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonthoracotomy ICD lead systems are associated with a low complication rate. Complications may or may not cause symptoms, usually occur after hospital discharge, and require reoperation. Complications are not related to a "learning curve." There is a significant difference in performance between different lead systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7724394     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02499.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

1.  Short and medium time experience with a tined, multilumen steroid eluting defibrillation lead.

Authors:  Halfdan Aass; Joseph Ilvento
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Rates and severity of perforation from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a 4-year study.

Authors:  Mintu Turakhia; Megha Prasad; Jeffrey Olgin; Nitish Badhwar; Zian H Tseng; Randall Lee; Gregory M Marcus; Byron K Lee
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Electrical injury on removal of implantable defibrillator after death.

Authors:  D Ghosh; M A James; R B Palmer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Cost-effectiveness of implanted defibrillators in young people with inherited cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  Ilan Goldenberg; Arthur J Moss; Barry J Maron; Andrew W Dick; Wojciech Zareba
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Simulation of mechanical environment in active lead fixation: effect of fixation helix size.

Authors:  Xuefeng Zhao; Jonathan F Wenk; Mike Burger; Yi Liu; Mithilesh K Das; William Combs; Liang Ge; Julius M Guccione; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Endovascular extraction techniques: Part 3: Results and indications in patients with an ICD.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  A long-term, prospective, cohort study on the performance of right ventricular pacing leads: comparison of active-fixation with passive-fixation leads.

Authors:  Lie Liu; Jiaojiao Tang; Hu Peng; Shulin Wu; Chunying Lin; Dongli Chen; Qianhuan Zhang; Yuanhong Liang; Silin Chen; Yan Chen; Huiqiang Wei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.