Literature DB >> 7724094

The impact of knowledge of human immunodeficiency virus serostatus on contraceptive choice and repeat pregnancy.

M K Lindsay1, J Grant, H B Peterson, S Willis, P Nelson, L Klein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine relationships among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serostatus, postpartum contraceptive choice, and the rate of repeat pregnancy within a short interval.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed in 83 seropositive and 218 seronegative women identified from an inner-city prenatal population undergoing routine voluntary HIV antibody screening from July 1987 through June 1989. Postpartum contraceptive choices and rate of repeat pregnancies were compared based on HIV serostatus.
RESULTS: Seropositive women were significantly more likely than seronegative women to undergo tubal sterilization (27 versus 15%; odds ratio [OR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-5.9). This relationship persisted after controlling for age, race, marital status, and parity by logistic regression modeling (adjusted OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.4-5.9). Seropositive women were significantly less likely than seronegative women to select oral contraceptives (34 versus 68%; OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.4), a relationship that persisted after controlling for age, race, marital status, parity, and foam and condom use (adjusted OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.5). Seropositive women were significantly more likely than seronegative women to select foam and condoms as their primary method of contraception (30 versus 15%; OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.5), a relationship that did not persist after controlling for age, race, marital status, and parity (adjusted OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.3). The risk of repeat pregnancy was slightly lower in seropositive versus seronegative women (34 versus 44%; OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.3). Most repeat pregnancies among seropositive and seronegative women were unplanned (90 and 82%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: There was a relationship between the method of postpartum contraception and HIV serostatus, but no significant difference in repeat pregnancy rates associated with choice of method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7724094     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00018-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Reproductive coercion among women living with HIV: an unexplored risk factor for negative sexual and mental health outcomes.

Authors:  Jocelyn C Anderson; Karen Trister Grace; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.177

2.  Trends of and factors associated with live-birth and abortion rates among HIV-positive and HIV-negative women.

Authors:  Lisa B Haddad; Kristin M Wall; C Christina Mehta; Elizabeth T Golub; Lisa Rahangdale; Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Roksana Karim; Rodney Wright; Howard Minkoff; Mardge Cohen; Seble Kassaye; Deborah Cohan; Igho Ofotokun; Susan E Cohn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Trends in contraceptive use among women with human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  Mengyang Sun; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Tracey E Wilson; Kathleen M Weber; Lorraine Sanchez-Keeland; Gypsyamber DʼSouza; Mary Young; D Heather Watts; Marla J Keller; Deborah Cohan; L Stewart Massad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Evidence-based guidelines for universal counselling and offering of HIV testing in pregnancy in Canada.

Authors:  L Samson; S King
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-02       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Factors affecting the HIV/AIDS epidemic: an ecological analysis of global data.

Authors:  M N I Mondal; M Shitan
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.927

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.