Literature DB >> 7723647

Lower and upper body anaerobic performance in male and female adolescent athletes.

B C Nindl1, M T Mahar, E A Harman, J F Patton.   

Abstract

Little data exist for upper and lower body mechanical power capability of adolescent athletes. This study compared arm (A) and leg (L) anaerobic peak and mean power (PP and MP) of 20 male and 20 female adolescent athletes after normalization for body mass (BM), fat-free mass (FFM), and lean A and L cross-sectional area (CSA). Power outputs were assessed by the Wingate anaerobic test. FFM and CSA were estimated via anthropometry. No significant (P > 0.05) differences existed between the sexes in Tanner sexual maturity, chronological age, or overall training activity. Males had higher (P < 0.001) absolute PP (W) (L 694 vs 442; A 494 vs 309) and MP (L 548 vs 307; A 337 vs 214). Ratio normalization and ANCOVA were used to remove the influence of body size differences. Ratio normalization showed that males had greater leg PP/BM, MP/BM, MP/FFM, MP/CSA, as well as arm PP/BM and MP/BM, whereas all leg and arm PP and MP ANCOVA adjusted means for BM, FFM, and CSA, except arm MP adjusted for FFM, were significantly (P < 0.01) higher for males than females. We conclude that factors other than muscle mass, possibly qualitative in nature, are responsible for the sex difference in anaerobic performance of adolescent athletes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7723647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  16 in total

1.  Short term power output in relation to growth and maturation.

Authors:  N Armstrong; J R Welsman; M Y Chia
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Muscle strength testing: use of normalisation for body size.

Authors:  Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Relationship between side medicine-ball throw performance and physical ability for male and female athletes.

Authors:  Yusuke Ikeda; Kota Kijima; Koichi Kawabata; Takafumi Fuchimoto; Akira Ito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Physiological profiles of elite judo athletes.

Authors:  Emerson Franchini; Fabrício B Del Vecchio; Karin A Matsushigue; Guilherme G Artioli
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Children's and adolescents' anaerobic performance during cycle ergometry.

Authors:  C A Williams
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Weightlifting for Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Kyle C Pierce; W Guy Hornsby; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 7.  The measurement and interpretation of aerobic fitness in children: current issues.

Authors:  J R Welsman; N Armstrong
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 8.  Muscle fatigue in males and females during multiple-sprint exercise.

Authors:  François Billaut; David Bishop
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Short-term muscle power during growth and maturation.

Authors:  Emmanuel Van Praagh; Eric Doré
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  General anthropometric and specific physical fitness profile of high-level junior water polo players.

Authors:  Miran Kondrič; Ognjen Uljević; Goran Gabrilo; Dean Kontić; Damir Sekulić
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.