Literature DB >> 7723147

Changes in Dutch opinions on active euthanasia, 1966 through 1991.

P J van der Maas1, L Pijnenborg, J J van Delden.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh：

Year:  1995        PMID： 7723147     DOI： 10.1001/jama.273.18.1411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN： 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Confusion between euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions: influences on public opinion poll results.

Authors:  Isabelle Marcoux; Brian L Mishara; Claire Durand
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 May-Jun

2.  Attitudes of cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists and members of the general public toward critical interventions at the end of life of terminally ill patients.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Kyung Hee Han; Sohee Park; Byeong Woo Park; Chi-Heum Cho; Sung Kim; Dae Ho Lee; Soon Nam Lee; Eun Sook Lee; Jung Hun Kang; Si-Young Kim; Jung Lim Lee; Dae Seog Heo; Chang Geol Lee; Yeun Keun Lim; Sam Yong Kim; Jong Soo Choi; Hyun Sik Jeong; Mison Chun
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The legislation of active voluntary euthanasia in Australia: will the slippery slope prove fatal?

Authors:  I H Kerridge; K R Mitchell
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  When is physician assisted suicide or euthanasia acceptable?

Authors:  S Frileux; C Lelièvre; M T Muñoz Sastre; E Mullet; P C Sorum
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Factors associated with the rejection of active euthanasia: a survey among the general public in Austria.

Authors:  Willibald J Stronegger; Nathalie T Burkert; Franziska Grossschädl; Wolfgang Freidl
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Physicians' experiences with euthanasia: a cross-sectional survey amongst a random sample of Dutch physicians to explore their concerns, feelings and pressure.

Authors:  Kirsten Evenblij; H Roeline W Pasman; Johannes J M van Delden; Agnes van der Heide; Suzanne van de Vathorst; Dick L Willems; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Two Decades of Research on Euthanasia from the Netherlands. What Have We Learnt and What Questions Remain?

Authors:  Judith A C Rietjens; Paul J van der Maas; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Johannes J M van Delden; Agnes van der Heide
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 1.352

8.  News media coverage of euthanasia: a content analysis of Dutch national newspapers.

Authors:  Judith A C Rietjens; Natasja J H Raijmakers; Pauline S C Kouwenhoven; Clive Seale; Ghislaine J M W van Thiel; Margo Trappenburg; Johannes J M van Delden; Agnes van der Heide
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Kyoung-Nam Kim; Jin-Ah Sim; Shin Hye Yoo; Miso Kim; Young Ae Kim; Beo Deul Kang; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Eun-Kee Song; Jung Hun Kang; Jung Hye Kwon; Jung Lim Lee; Eun Mi Nam; Chi Hoon Maeng; Eun Joo Kang; Young Rok Do; Yoon Seok Choi; Kyung Hae Jung
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.