R Glazier1, R Buchbinder, M Bell. 1. University of Toronto, Wellesley Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise evidence of the effectiveness of continuing medical education (CME) in rheumatic diseases for primary care physicians. METHODS: Three physicians independently applied preset criteria to evaluated CME interventions published between January 1966 and August 1993. RESULT: Eight of 166 articles identified were critically appraised, 7 of which had positive results. Marked heterogeneity in educational interventions, evaluative methods, and outcomes was noted. CONCLUSION: Despite generally positive results, weak methodology precludes drawing firm conclusions about the effectiveness of CME in rheumatic diseases.
OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise evidence of the effectiveness of continuing medical education (CME) in rheumatic diseases for primary care physicians. METHODS: Three physicians independently applied preset criteria to evaluated CME interventions published between January 1966 and August 1993. RESULT: Eight of 166 articles identified were critically appraised, 7 of which had positive results. Marked heterogeneity in educational interventions, evaluative methods, and outcomes was noted. CONCLUSION: Despite generally positive results, weak methodology precludes drawing firm conclusions about the effectiveness of CME in rheumatic diseases.