Literature DB >> 9120652

Can a specialty society educate its members to think differently about clinical decisions? Results of a randomized trial.

D R Gifford1, B S Mittman, A Fink, A B Lanto, M L Lee, B G Vickrey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Measure the effect of specialty society-developed continuing medical education (CME) on clinical decision making.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: National sample of neurologists. PARTICIPANTS: Of 492 neurologists randomly selected from an ongoing American Academy of Neurology CME program, 248 were randomized to receive a mailed CME course, and 244 did not receive it. INTERVENTION: A mailed educational course on movement disorders, developed by the specialty society, containing information on diseases and practice recommendations with illustrative case presentations.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We assessed adherence to 16 practice recommendations on disease detection, diagnostic test use, and treatments by mailed survey sent to all subjects 4.5 months after the intervention group received the course (73% response rate). The survey contained detailed clinical scenarios to measure self-reported clinical decision making and short open-ended questions to measure factual knowledge. More intervention participants (up to 2.6 times more) than control subjects reported clinical decision making adherent to 9 of the 16 recommendations (p < .05). For 4 of the other 7 recommendations, adherence exceeded 85% in both groups. Within the intervention group, neurologists who read the educational course were 2 to 6 times more likely to be adherent than neurologists who did not. The intervention group had better factual knowledge than control subjects in six of seven areas (p < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: This educational course improved neurologists' reported decision making. Specialty society-developed CME that utilizes a similar format may enhance the effectiveness of mailed CME information to improve physicians' approach to clinical decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9120652     DOI: 10.1007/bf02600157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  32 in total

1.  Principles of educational outreach ('academic detailing') to improve clinical decision making.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; J Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Validity of self-reports of behavior changes by participants after a CME course.

Authors:  L Curry; I E Purkis
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1986-07

3.  Does a mailed continuing education program improve physician performance? Results of a randomized trial in antihypertensive care.

Authors:  C E Evans; R B Haynes; N J Birkett; J R Gilbert; D W Taylor; D L Sackett; M E Johnston; S A Hewson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986 Jan 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Continuing medical education: experience and opinions of consultants.

Authors:  D N Kerr; S A Jones; C S Easmon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-22

5.  Changing clinical practice. Prospective study of the impact of continuing medical education and quality assurance programs on use of prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  F A Anderson; H B Wheeler; R J Goldberg; D W Hosmer; A Forcier; N A Patwardhan
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-03-28

6.  Improving drug-therapy decisions through educational outreach. A randomized controlled trial of academically based "detailing".

Authors:  J Avorn; S B Soumerai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A randomized trial of continuing medical education.

Authors:  J C Sibley; D L Sackett; V Neufeld; B Gerrard; K V Rudnick; W Fraser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-03-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Survey of health professionals' information habits and needs. Conducted through personal interviews.

Authors:  E R Stinson; D A Mueller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The effectiveness of continuing medical education in changing the behavior of physicians caring for patients with acute myocardial infarction. A controlled randomized trial.

Authors:  C W White; M A Albanese; D D Brown; R M Caplan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice.

Authors:  J Kosecoff; D E Kanouse; W H Rogers; L McCloskey; C M Winslow; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  From evidence to action.

Authors:  Gary S Gronseth
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-07

Review 2.  Physician education, evidence and the coming of age of CME.

Authors:  D Davis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Optimising drug utilisation in long term care.

Authors:  Kate L Lapane; Carmel M Hughes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Curing neurophobia in medical schools: evidence-based strategies.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk; Nguyen Minh Duc
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-09-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.