Literature DB >> 7717416

Paracentric inversions in humans: a review of 446 paracentric inversions with presentation of 120 new cases.

M J Pettenati1, P N Rao, M C Phelan, F Grass, K W Rao, P Cosper, A J Carroll, F Elder, J L Smith, M D Higgins.   

Abstract

We present a large review of 446 cases of paracentric inversions (PAI), including 120 new cases, to assess their incidence, distribution, inheritance, modes of ascertainment, interchromosomal effects, viable recombinant offspring, and clinical relevance. All 23 autosomes and sex chromosomes had inversions. However, none were identified in chromosome arms 18p, 19q, 20q, and Yp. PAI were most commonly reported in chromosomes 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, and 14 and less frequently in chromosomes 4, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and Y. Inversions were most common in chromosome arms 6p, 7q, 11q, and 14q and observed least in chromosome arms 2p, 2q, 3q, 4q, and 6q. Frequently encountered breakpoints included 3(p13p25), 6(p12p23), 6(p12p25), 7(q11q22), and 11(q21q23). Ascertainment was primarily incidental (54.5%), mental retardation and/or congenital anomalies (22.2%), spontaneous abortions (11.4%), associations with syndromes (3.0%), and infertility (2.0%) accounted for the remainder. Ascertainment was neither related to the length of the inverted segment nor to specific inversions except for PAI of Xq which often presented with manifestations of Ullrich-Turner syndrome. Sixty-six percent of PAI were inherited while 8.5% were de novo. Recombination was observed in 17 cases, 15 of which resulted in a monocentric chromosomal deletion or duplication. No common factors were identified that suggested a tendency towards recombination. The incidence of viable recombinants was estimated to be 3.8%. This review documents that PAI are perhaps more commonly identified than suggested in previous reviews. Despite the possible bias of ascertainment in some cases, there may be associated risks with PAI that require further examination. Our data suggest that PAI carriers do not appear to be free of risks of abnormalities or abnormal progeny and caution is recommended when counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7717416     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320550207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  15 in total

1.  Constitutional cytogenetic analysis in men with hereditary testicular germ cell tumor: no evidence of disease-related abnormalities.

Authors:  Christine M Mueller; Larissa Korde; Hormuzd A Katki; Philip S Rosenberg; June A Peters; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Investigation of the origins of human autosomal inversions.

Authors:  N Simon Thomas; Victoria Bryant; Vivienne Maloney; Annette E Cockwell; Patricia A Jacobs
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  First-trimester combined screening is effective for the detection of unbalanced chromosomal translocations at 11 to 12 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Shangyu Huang; Chialin Chang; Pojen Cheng; Chinghua Hsiao; Yungkuei Soong; Tao Duan
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Not para-, not peri-, but centric inversion of chromosome 12.

Authors:  A N Silahtaroglu; S Hacihanefioglu; G S Güven; A Cenani; J Wirth; N Tommerup; Z Tümer
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Paracentric inversion of chromosome 2 associated with cryptic duplication of 2q14 and deletion of 2q37 in a patient with autism.

Authors:  Françoise Devillard; Vincent Guinchat; Daniel Moreno-De-Luca; Anne-Claude Tabet; Nicolas Gruchy; Pascale Guillem; Marie-Ange Nguyen Morel; Nathalie Leporrier; Marion Leboyer; Pierre-Simon Jouk; James Lespinasse; Catalina Betancur
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Studies of male and female meiosis in inv(4)(p1.4;q2.3) pig carriers.

Authors:  Katia Massip; Martine Yerle; Yvon Billon; Stéphane Ferchaud; Nathalie Bonnet; Anne Calgaro; Nicolas Mary; Anne-Marie Dudez; Céline Sentenac; Christophe Plard; Alain Ducos; Alain Pinton
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Molecular analysis of deletion (17)(p11.2p11.2) in a family segregating a 17p paracentric inversion: implications for carriers of paracentric inversions.

Authors:  S P Yang; S I Bidichandani; L E Figuera; R C Juyal; P J Saxon; A Baldini; P I Patel
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Breakpoint mapping and complete analysis of meiotic segregation patterns in three men heterozygous for paracentric inversions.

Authors:  Samarth Bhatt; Kamran Moradkhani; Kristin Mrasek; Jacques Puechberty; Marina Manvelyan; Friederike Hunstig; Genevieve Lefort; Anja Weise; James Lespinasse; Pierre Sarda; Thomas Liehr; Samir Hamamah; Franck Pellestor
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Two siblings with alternate unbalanced recombinants derived from a large cryptic maternal pericentric inversion of chromosome 20.

Authors:  Cheryl Descipio; Jennifer D Morrissette; Laura K Conlin; Dinah Clark; Maninder Kaur; James Coplan; Harold Riethman; Nancy B Spinner; Ian D Krantz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  A familial deletion 4q syndrome: An outcome of a paracentric inversion.

Authors:  Meena Lall; Ratna Puri; Pushpa Saviour; Ishwar Verma
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.