Literature DB >> 21125327

Studies of male and female meiosis in inv(4)(p1.4;q2.3) pig carriers.

Katia Massip1, Martine Yerle, Yvon Billon, Stéphane Ferchaud, Nathalie Bonnet, Anne Calgaro, Nicolas Mary, Anne-Marie Dudez, Céline Sentenac, Christophe Plard, Alain Ducos, Alain Pinton.   

Abstract

Inversions are well-known structural chromosomal rearrangements in humans and pigs. Such rearrangements generally have no effect on the carrier's phenotype. However, the presence of an inversion may impair spermatogenesis and lead to the production of recombinant gametes, responsible for early miscarriages, stillbirth, or congenital abnormalities. This is the first report on meiotic segregation and pairing behavior of the inv(4)(p1.4;q2.3) pericentric inversion in pigs. Despite the very large size of the inverted fragment (76% of the chromosome), SpermFISH results showed that only 4.08% of the gametes produced by male heterozygotes were unbalanced. This low proportion could be explained by the particular behavior of normal and inverted SSC4 chromosomes during the initial stages of meiosis. Indeed, immunohistochemistry analyses revealed that heterosynapsis occurred in 92% of the cells, whereas synaptic adjustment was detected in a few spermatocytes only. Unexpectedly, the proportion of unbalanced gametes produced by female heterozygotes, estimated by FISH on metaphase II oocytes, was also very low (3.69%) and comparable to that in males. According to previous results for male and female meiotic processes, different proportions of recombinant gametes in the two genders would have been expected. Complementary studies should be carried out to further document the meiotic behavior of inversions in pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21125327     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-010-9162-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  47 in total

1.  Stable dicentric duplication-deficiency chromosome 14 resulting from crossing-over within a maternal paracentric inversion.

Authors:  Geneviève Lefort; Patricia Blanchet; Nabia Belgrade; François Rivier; Anne Marie Chaze; Pierre Sarda; Jacques Demaille; Franck Pellestor
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-12-15

Review 2.  Cytogenetic studies in male infertility: a review.

Authors:  M De Braekeleer; T N Dao
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Evolution of the meiotic prophase and of the chromosome pairing process during human fetal ovarian development.

Authors:  I Roig; P Robles; R Garcia; M Martin; J Egozcue; Ll Cabero; S Barambio; M Garcia
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Meiotic and sperm chromosome analysis in a male carrier of an inverted insertion (3;10)(q13.2;p14p13).

Authors:  A S Goldman; R H Martin; R Johannisson; C P Gould; E V Davison; J E Emslie; J Burn; M A Hultén
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 5.  Pericentric inversions in man. A French collaborative study. Groupe de Cytogénéticiens Français.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Genet       Date:  1986

6.  Sperm chromosome analysis in two cases of paracentric inversion.

Authors:  François Vialard; Audoin Delanete; Patrice Clement; Brigitte Simon-Bouy; François Xavier Aubriot; Jacqueline Selva
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Chromosome segregation in an infertile man carrying a unique pericentric inversion, inv(21)(p12q22.3), analysed using fluorescence in situ hybridization on sperm nuclei: significance for clinical genetics. A case report.

Authors:  V Malan; E Pipiras; C Sifer; S Kanafani; I Cedrin-Durnerin; B Martin-Pont; J N Hugues; J P Wolf; B Benzacken
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Influence of sex on the meiotic segregation of a t(13;17) Robertsonian translocation: a case study in the pig.

Authors:  A Pinton; A Calgaro; N Bonnet; S Ferchaud; S Billoux; A M Dudez; N Mary; K Massip; A Bonnet-Garnier; M Yerle; A Ducos
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Further examination of the production-line hypothesis in mouse foetal oocytes. I. Inversion heterozygotes.

Authors:  C Tease; G Fisher
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Chromosomal control of pig populations in France: 2002-2006 survey.

Authors:  Alain Ducos; Hélène-Marie Berland; Nathalie Bonnet; Anne Calgaro; Sébastien Billoux; Nicolas Mary; Amélie Garnier-Bonnet; Roland Darré; Alain Pinton
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  8 in total

1.  Recombination and synaptic adjustment in oocytes of mice heterozygous for a large paracentric inversion.

Authors:  Anna A Torgasheva; Nikolai B Rubtsov; Pavel M Borodin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  The Interchromosomal Effect: Different Meanings for Different Organisms.

Authors:  Danny E Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Classical, Molecular, and Genomic Cytogenetics of the Pig, a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Brendan Donaldson; Daniel A F Villagomez; W Allan King
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Recombination suppression in heterozygotes for a pericentric inversion induces the interchromosomal effect on crossovers in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Pasquale Termolino; Matthieu Falque; Riccardo Aiese Cigliano; Gaetana Cremona; Rosa Paparo; Antoine Ederveen; Olivier C Martin; Federica M Consiglio; Clara Conicella
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  Chromosomal Polymorphism and Speciation: The Case of the Genus Mazama (Cetartiodactyla; Cervidae).

Authors:  David Javier Galindo; Gabriela Siqueira Martins; Miluse Vozdova; Halina Cernohorska; Svatava Kubickova; Agda Maria Bernegossi; Dita Kadlcikova; Jiri Rubes; José Maurício Barbanti Duarte
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Chromosomal Inversion Polymorphisms in Two Sympatric Ascidian Lineages.

Authors:  Yutaka Satou; Atsuko Sato; Hitoyoshi Yasuo; Yukie Mihirogi; John Bishop; Manabu Fujie; Mayumi Kawamitsu; Kanako Hisata; Noriyuki Satoh
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Meiotic recombination analyses of individual chromosomes in male domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica).

Authors:  Nicolas Mary; Harmonie Barasc; Stéphane Ferchaud; Yvon Billon; Frédéric Meslier; David Robelin; Anne Calgaro; Anne-Marie Loustau-Dudez; Nathalie Bonnet; Martine Yerle; Hervé Acloque; Alain Ducos; Alain Pinton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Meiotic Recombination Analyses in Pigs Carrying Different Balanced Structural Chromosomal Rearrangements.

Authors:  Nicolas Mary; Harmonie Barasc; Stéphane Ferchaud; Aurélia Priet; Anne Calgaro; Anne-Marie Loustau-Dudez; Nathalie Bonnet; Martine Yerle; Alain Ducos; Alain Pinton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.