Literature DB >> 7716624

Stability increase of the lumbar spine with different muscle groups. A biomechanical in vitro study.

H J Wilke1, S Wolf, L E Claes, M Arand, A Wiesend.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study investigated the influence of five different muscle groups on the monosegmental motion (L4-L5) during pure flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments.
OBJECTIVES: The results showed and compared the effect of different muscle groups acting in different directions on the stability of a single motion segment to find loading conditions for in vitro experiments that simulate more physiologically reasonable loads. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In spine biomechanics research, most in vitro experiments have been carried out without applying muscle forces, even though these forces stabilize the spinal column in vivo.
METHODS: Seven human lumbosacral spines were tested in a spine tester that allows simulation of up to five symmetrical muscle forces. Changing pure flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments up to +/- 3.75 Nm were applied without muscle forces, with different muscle groups and combinations. The three-dimensional monosegmental motion was determined using an instrumented spatial linkage system.
RESULTS: Simulated muscle forces were found to strongly influence load-deformation characteristics. Muscle action generally decreased the range of motion and the neutral zone of the motion segments. This was most evident for flexion and extension. After five pairs of symmetrical, constant muscle forces were applied (80 N per pair), the range of motion decreased about 93% in flexion and 85% in extension. The total neutral zone for flexion and extension was decreased by 83% muscle action. The multifidus muscle group had the strongest influence.
CONCLUSION: This experiment showed the importance of including at least some of the most important muscle groups in in vitro experiments on lumbar spine specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7716624     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199501150-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  97 in total

1.  Effects of three different training modalities on the cross sectional area of the lumbar multifidus muscle in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  L A Danneels; G G Vanderstraeten; D C Cambier; E E Witvrouw; J Bourgois; W Dankaerts; H J De Cuyper
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads--application of kinematics-based algorithm.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; M El-Rich; D G Pop; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Plane of vertebral movement eliciting muscle lengthening history in the low back influences the decrease in muscle spindle responsiveness of the cat.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Dong-Yuan Cao; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-09-29

4.  Evaluation of unilateral cage-instrumented fixation for lumbar spine.

Authors:  Ti-Sheng Chang; Jia-Hao Chang; Chien-Shiung Wang; Hung-Yi Chen; Ching-Wei Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  A history of spine biomechanics. Focus on 20th century progress.

Authors:  T R Oxland
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  ROLLING REVISITED: USING ROLLING TO ASSESS AND TREAT NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL AND COORDINATION OF THE CORE AND EXTREMITIES OF ATHLETES.

Authors:  Barbara J Hoogenboom; Michael L Voight
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-11

7.  Vertebral position alters paraspinal muscle spindle responsiveness in the feline spine: effect of positioning duration.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Biofidelic whole cervical spine model with muscle force replication for whiplash simulation.

Authors:  P C Ivancic; Manohar M Panjabi; S Ito; P A Cripton; J L Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Asokumar Buvanendran; Tim Deer; Shuchita Garg; W Michael Hooten; Robert W Hurley; David J Kennedy; Brian C McLean; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; Sanjog Pangarkar; David Anthony Provenzano; Richard Rauck; B Todd Sitzman; Matthew Smuck; Jan van Zundert; Kevin Vorenkamp; Mark S Wallace; Zirong Zhao
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 6.288

10.  Lumbar multifidus muscle thickness does not predict patients with low back pain who improve with trunk stabilization exercises.

Authors:  Kristen A Zielinski; Sharon M Henry; Rebecca H Ouellette-Morton; Michael J DeSarno
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.