Literature DB >> 7716592

Incidence of neonatal circumcision in Atlanta, 1985-1986.

T R O'Brien1, E E Calle, W K Poole.   

Abstract

We reviewed Atlanta area hospital records to determine the following regarding neonatal circumcision: incidence in July 1985; incidence after publicized serious complications of circumcision in August 1985; medical record documentation; and the complication rate. After stratified sampling from hospital birth logs, we abstracted information from medical charts and calculated weighted estimates and P values. The circumcision incidence was 89.3% in July 1985, 87.5% in September 1985, and 84.3% in September 1986. Circumcision was recorded on the medical record face sheet for 84.3% of circumcised boys. The complication rate was 3.1%; no serious complications were recorded. We conclude the following: circumcision incidence was high during the study period; publicity regarding adverse outcomes may have decreased the subsequent incidence of the procedure; hospital discharge data, which rely on medical record face sheet information, underestimate the true incidence of neonatal circumcision; and neonatal circumcision is usually safe, but serious complications may occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7716592     DOI: 10.1097/00007611-199504000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  9 in total

1.  Minimally invasive circumcision with a novel plastic clamp technique: a review of 7,500 cases.

Authors:  Ferda M Senel; Mustafa Demirelli; Sehmuz Oztek
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Window technique on circumcision.

Authors:  Halil Basar; Erdal Yilmaz; Mehmed Murat Basar; Ertan Batislam; Devrim Tuglu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen A Weiss; Natasha Larke; Daniel Halperin; Inon Schenker
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Determinants and policy implications of male circumcision in the United States.

Authors:  Arleen A Leibowitz; Katherine Desmond; Thomas Belin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Epidemiology of complications of male circumcision in Ibadan, Nigeria.

Authors:  Linus I Okeke; Adanze A Asinobi; Odunayo S Ikuerowo
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Surgically correctable morbidity from male circumcision: indications for specialist surgical care in lagos.

Authors:  Adesoji O Ademuyiwa; Rufus W Ojewola; Olumide A Elebute; Emmanuel A Jeje; Chris O Bode
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2012-07

Review 7.  How the circumcision solution in Africa will increase HIV infections.

Authors:  Robert S Van Howe; Michelle R Storms
Journal:  J Public Health Afr       Date:  2011-02-11

Review 8.  Exposé of misleading claims that male circumcision will increase HIV infections in Africa.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Ronald H Gray; Daniel T Halperin; Richard Wamai; Bertran Auvert; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  J Public Health Afr       Date:  2011-09-05

9.  Circumcision registry promotes precise research and fosters informed parental decisions.

Authors:  Robert S Van Howe; Morten Frisch; Peter W Adler; J Steven Svoboda
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.