Literature DB >> 7714976

The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis.

M R Cupp1, D G Bostwick, R P Myers, J E Oesterling.   

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that prostate cancer with a volume of 0.5 ml. or less and a Gleason score of less than 7 may be clinically insignificant and may be managed with watchful waiting. A proposed method of determining the volume of cancer in the prostate gland has been the grade and volume of cancer present in the transrectal needle biopsy specimen. Volume of cancer in the biopsy specimen as a predictor of volume of cancer in the prostate gland was studied in 130 men who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma. Of the men 46 (35%) had clinical stage T1c (nonpalpable) disease, while 84 (65%) had clinical stage T2 (palpable) disease. Each radical prostatectomy specimen was whole-mounted and step-sectioned for accurate cancer volume determination. Three parameters for measuring volume of cancer in the biopsy specimen (percentage of biopsy cores involved, millimeters of cancer per biopsy core and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimen) were determined and compared by Spearman rank correlation analysis. The percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimen was marginally better than the percentage of cores involved and the millimeters of cancer per biopsy core as a predictor of cancer volume in the radical prostatectomy specimen. While regression analysis revealed a direct correlation between the volume of cancer in the biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens (r = 0.51), there was significant variability in prostate cancer volume for a given percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimen since the standard error of the estimate was 6.1 ml. Of the 13 patients with 5% or less cancer volume and a Gleason score of less than 7 in the biopsy specimen 1 (8%) had a cancer smaller than 0.5 ml. in volume in the radical prostatectomy specimen. Therefore, the risk of removing clinically insignificant prostate cancer, even when the biopsy parameter indicates low volume disease, is less than 10%. Overall, only 3 study patients (2.3%) had a prostate cancer volume of less than 0.5 ml. With 97.7% of the men having a clinically significant cancer by a volume criterion, it is apparent that the majority of clinically insignificant prostate cancers remained undetected and untreated. Currently, transrectal needle biopsy does not provide adequate information for differentiating between clinically insignificant and life threatening prostate cancer on an individual basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

1.  Tissue shrinkage after fixation with formalin injection of prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Sara Jonmarker; Alexander Valdman; Anna Lindberg; Magnus Hellström; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  [Selection criteria for the expected management of localised prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Graefen; G Salomon; E Currlin; C Eichelberg; T Schlomm; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Biopsy diagnosis of prostatic cancer--current areas of concern.

Authors:  M R Feneley; M C Parkinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Prospective evaluation of men with stage T1C adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  H B Carter; J Sauvageot; P C Walsh; J I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  A quantitative model for the dynamics of serum prostate-specific antigen as a marker for cancerous growth: an explanation for a medical anomaly.

Authors:  K R Swanson; L D True; D W Lin; K R Buhler; R Vessella; J D Murray
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  Prediction of significant cancer in men with stage T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  H B Carter; J I Epstein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Pathologic basis of focal therapy for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Mouraviev; Janice M Mayes; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  [Active surveillance for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Graefen; S Ahyai; R Heuer; G Salomon; T Schlomm; H Isbarn; L Budäus; H Heinzer; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Active surveillance versus radical treatment for favorable-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-09

10.  Can a Gleason 6 or Less Microfocus of Prostate Cancer in One Biopsy and Prostate-Specific Antigen Level <10 ng/mL Be Defined as the Archetype of Low-Risk Prostate Disease?

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Luigi Benecchi; Fabio Grizzi; Mauro Seveso; Guido Giusti; Alessandro Piccinelli; Alessio Benetti; Piergiuseppe Colombo; Francesco Minuti; Pierpaolo Graziotti
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.