Literature DB >> 16909262

Tissue shrinkage after fixation with formalin injection of prostatectomy specimens.

Sara Jonmarker1, Alexander Valdman, Anna Lindberg, Magnus Hellström, Lars Egevad.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer volume correlates with stage, grade, and progression after prostatectomy. When tumor volume is measured planimetrically, results are multiplied by a correction factor to compensate for tissue shrinkage caused by processing. Injection of formalin into prostatectomy specimens was suggested for improved fixation. Our aim was to investigate how this affects the prostate volume. We studied 142 radical prostatectomy specimens. All prostates were immersed in 10% formalin. In 84 prostates (59%) we also injected 20 ml of formalin before routine fixation. The prostates were weighed unfixed after injection and after final fixation. The specimens were sliced and totally embedded. The transverse diameters of the prostates were measured on unfixed specimens and microscopic sections. The average weight loss after final fixation was 5.8 and 8.6% for formalin-injected specimens and standard-fixed specimens, respectively (p<0.001). However, when total shrinkage was estimated from the transverse diameters, there was no difference related to fixation technique (p=0.59). The average linear shrinkage was 4.5%, corresponding to a volume correction factor of 1.15. We conclude that formalin injection for fixation of prostate tissue does not influence tumor volume calculation compared to conventional fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16909262     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-006-0259-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  26 in total

1.  Inadequate formalin fixation decreases reliability of p27 immunohistochemical staining: probing optimal fixation time using high-density tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Angelo M De Marzo; Helen H Fedor; Wesely R Gage; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Histologic grade, DNA ploidy, and intraglandular tumor extent as indicators of tumor progression of clinical stage B prostatic carcinoma. A direct comparison.

Authors:  P A Humphrey; P J Walther; S M Currin; R T Vollmer
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  Risk factors for progression in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  S E Lerner; M L Blute; H Zincke
Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol       Date:  1996-05

4.  Assessment of morphometric measurements of prostate carcinoma volume.

Authors:  M Noguchi; T A Stamey; J E McNeal; C E Yemoto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Pathological and molecular aspects of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Angelo M DeMarzo; William G Nelson; William B Isaacs; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer.

Authors:  J I Epstein; P C Walsh; M Carmichael; C B Brendler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The distribution of residual cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens in stage A prostate cancer.

Authors:  D R Greene; S Egawa; G Neerhut; W Flanagan; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  An abbreviated standard procedure for accurate tumor volume estimation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  H P Schmid; J E McNeal
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Standardized in vitro mapping with multiple core biopsies of total prostatectomy specimens: localization and prediction of tumour volume and grade.

Authors:  M Häggman; O Nybacka; B Nordin; C Busch
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1994-11

10.  Is tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of followup.

Authors:  J I Epstein; M Carmichael; A W Partin; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  45 in total

1.  Semi-automatic deformable registration of prostate MR images to pathological slices.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Louisa Bokacheva; Dirk-Jan Kroon; Oguz Akin; Hedvig Hricak; Daniel Chamudot; Samson Fine; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  The Achilles tendon insertion is crescent-shaped: an in vitro anatomic investigation.

Authors:  Heinz Lohrer; Sabine Arentz; Tanja Nauck; Nadja V Dorn-Lange; Moritz A Konerding
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds.

Authors:  Vijay Shah; Thomas Pohida; Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Maria Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter Choyke; Marcelino Bernardo
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.523

4.  Assessment of change in prostate volume and shape following surgical resection through co-registration of in-vivo MRI and fresh specimen ex-vivo MRI.

Authors:  C Orczyk; S S Taneja; H Rusinek; A B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  MicroCT versus sTSLIM 3D imaging of the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Jan A N Buytaert; Shane B Johnson; Manuel Dierick; Wasil H M Salih; Peter A Santi
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  Full-field thickness distribution of human tympanic membrane obtained with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Sam Van der Jeught; Joris J J Dirckx; Johan R M Aerts; Adrian Bradu; Adrian G H Podoleanu; Jan A N Buytaert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-15

7.  Imaging of prostate cancer: a platform for 3D co-registration of in-vivo MRI ex-vivo MRI and pathology.

Authors:  Clement Orczyk; Artem Mikheev; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Jonathan Melamed; Samir S Taneja; Henry Rusinek
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-23

8.  Formalin tissue fixation biases myelin-sensitive MRI.

Authors:  Alan C Seifert; Melissa Umphlett; Marco Hefti; Mary Fowkes; Junqian Xu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Contributions of mouse genetic background and age on anterior lens capsule thickness.

Authors:  Brian P Danysh; Kirk J Czymmek; Pecos T Olurin; Jacob G Sivak; Melinda K Duncan
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging tumor volume with histopathology.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Omer Aras; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Vijay Shah; Marcelino Bernardo; Thomas Pohida; Dagane Daar; Compton Benjamin; Yolanda L McKinney; W Marston Linehan; Bradford J Wood; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.