Literature DB >> 7714470

Contribution of listeners' approaching motion to auditory distance perception.

D H Ashmead1, D L Davis, A Northington.   

Abstract

Of the several sources of acoustic information for distance perception, those arising from motion of the listener or sound source have received little attention. This motion-related information (recently called acoustic tau) is described, and experiments evaluating its utilization are presented. Accuracy and consistency at walking to the locations of briefly presented sounds were better when people listened while walking than while standing still. Manipulations of the sound to simulate shorter or longer target distances produced appropriate undershooting but not overshooting. The results indicate that people use motion-related acoustic information about distance to guide their locomotor actions, although they do not take full advantage of this information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714470     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.2.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  Auditory looming perception in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; John G Neuhoff; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change.

Authors:  Michael K McBeath; John G Neuhoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

3.  Spatial working memory for locations specified by vision and audition: testing the amodality hypothesis.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; Roberta L Klatzky; Brendan McHugh; Nicholas A Giudice
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Best Distance Perception in Virtual Audiovisual Environment.

Authors:  Hui Song; Ke Ma
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-28

5.  Compression of auditory space during forward self-motion.

Authors:  Wataru Teramoto; Shuichi Sakamoto; Fumimasa Furune; Jiro Gyoba; Yôiti Suzuki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Movement and perceptual strategies to intercept virtual sound sources.

Authors:  Naeem Komeilipoor; Matthew W M Rodger; Paola Cesari; Cathy M Craig
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Auditory/visual distance estimation: accuracy and variability.

Authors:  Paul W Anderson; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-07

8.  Ranging in human sonar: effects of additional early reflections and exploratory head movements.

Authors:  Ludwig Wallmeier; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Pavel Zahorik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The detection of differences in the cues to distance by elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; Stuart Gatehouse; Julia Blaschke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.