Literature DB >> 7712416

Beyond universal precautions.

J W Osterman.   

Abstract

Universal precautions have gained wide acceptance in the literature and are promoted by major health care regulatory bodies as a measure to prevent nosocomial transmission of bloodborne diseases. Nevertheless, Dr. James G. Wright and associates (see pages 1089 to 1095 of this issue) provide evidence of the infrequent use of universal precautions by surgeons in Toronto. Their findings are consistent with those of similar studies and point to the limitations of any safety approach that relies on the active compliance of individuals rather than on passive, environmental controls. Successful approaches to optimizing workplace safety should first emphasize passive measures for risk abatement, including firm policies, the use of safer equipment and techniques, procedural safeguards and regular monitoring. Routine voluntary screening of patients undergoing procedures that pose a high risk of contamination may improve compliance to safety procedures by health care personnel. Further study is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7712416      PMCID: PMC1337651     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  26 in total

1.  The Surgical Infection Society's policy on human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B and C infection. The Ad Hoc Committee on Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and Hepatitis.

Authors:  J M Davis; R H Demling; F R Lewis; E Hoover; J P Waymack
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-02

2.  Blood contact and exposure in the operating room.

Authors:  S L Popejoy; D E Fry
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1991-06

3.  In-use evaluation of surgical gowns.

Authors:  E J Quebbeman; G L Telford; S Hubbard; K Wadsworth; B Hardman; H Goodman; M S Gottlieb
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-05

4.  A universal precautions monitoring system adaptable to any health care department.

Authors:  V C DeFilippo; R W Bowen; D H Ingbar
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Glove use by health care workers: results of a tristate investigation.

Authors:  R G Kaczmarek; R M Moore; J McCrohan; J T Arrowsmith-Lowe; C Caquelin; C Reynolds; E Israel
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Blunt needles in fascial closure.

Authors:  F J Montz; J M Fowler; R Farias-Eisner; T J Nash
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1991-08

7.  The effect of double gloving on frequency of glove perforations.

Authors:  B Bennett; P Duff
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Percutaneous injuries during surgical procedures.

Authors:  J I Tokars; D M Bell; D H Culver; R Marcus; M H Mendelson; E P Sloan; B F Farber; D Fligner; M E Chamberland; P S McKibben
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Double gloving. Protecting surgeons from blood contamination in the operating room.

Authors:  E J Quebbeman; G L Telford; K Wadsworth; S Hubbard; H Goodman; M S Gottlieb
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-02

10.  Risk of blood contamination and injury to operating room personnel.

Authors:  E J Quebbeman; G L Telford; S Hubbard; K Wadsworth; B Hardman; H Goodman; M S Gottlieb
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.