Literature DB >> 7711686

Electronic quality of life questionnaires: a comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study.

H E Drummond1, S Ghosh, A Ferguson, D Brackenridge, B Tiplady.   

Abstract

The use of pen-based electronic questionnaires and conventional paper questionnaires was compared in a randomized crossover study. Forty-six patients, aged 17-81 years, suffering from gastro-intestinal disorders, initially filled in a paper quality of life questionnaire for familiarization purposes, then on two subsequent visits completed electronic and paper questionnaires in randomized order. At the last visit they completed a preference survey. The results showed a high degree of acceptability of the electronic questionnaire, with 57% of patient preferring electronic and 13% preferring paper, while the remaining 30% expressed no preference. Neither age, gender nor familiarity with technology showed any marked association with patients' preferences. All patients found both paper and electronic questionnaires easy to use. Data were more complete on the electronic questionnaire (100%) than on the paper (99.1%). Data handling procedures were greatly simplified. These results show that major benefits in completeness of data, speed of data flow, and data handling workload can be obtained from the use of pen-based electronic questionnaires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7711686     DOI: 10.1007/bf00434379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  2 in total

1.  The two-period cross-over clinical trial.

Authors:  M Hills; P Armitage
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Quality of life in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. An improved evaluation of treatment regimens?

Authors:  E Dimenäs; H Glise; B Hallerbäck; H Hernqvist; J Svedlund; I Wiklund
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.423

  2 in total
  24 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality of life and regulatory issues in the US and Canada.

Authors:  Judith Glennie
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Feasibility of using a handheld electronic device for the collection of patient reported outcomes data from children.

Authors:  Lisa A Vinney; John D Grade; Nadine P Connor
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Validation of web-based administration of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12).

Authors:  Brent A Parnell; Gena C Dunivan; Annamarie Connolly; Mary L Jannelli; Ellen C Wells; Elizabeth J Geller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Crossover randomized controlled trial of the electronic version of the Chinese SF-36.

Authors:  Tian-hui Chen; Lu Li; Joerg M Sigle; Ya-ping Du; Hong-mei Wang; Jun Lei
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Chemotherapy line-associated differences in quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  B Mayrbäurl; L M Wintner; J M Giesinger; Th Himmelfreundpointner; S Burgstaller; B Holzner; J Thaler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version.

Authors:  Judy M Ryan; John R Corry; Robyn Attewell; Michael J Smithson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Rapid assessment of psychosocial well-being: are computers the way forward in a clinical setting?

Authors:  Allison Boyes; Sallie Newell; Afaf Girgis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Depression screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 administered on a touch screen computer.

Authors:  Jesse R Fann; Donna L Berry; Seth Wolpin; Mary Austin-Seymour; Nigel Bush; Barbara Halpenny; William B Lober; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data.

Authors:  Amy P Abernethy; James E Herndon; Jane L Wheeler; Meenal Patwardhan; Heather Shaw; H Kim Lyerly; Kevin Weinfurt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Evaluation of mood disorder patients in a primary care practice: measures of affective temperament, mental health risk factors, and functional health in a retrospective, descriptive study of 35 patients.

Authors:  Patricia D Cunningham; Pamela D Connor; J Sloan Manning; Cheryl Cummings Stegbauer; Sarah L Mynatt
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.