Literature DB >> 7707909

Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels.

J N Oshinski1, D N Ku, R I Pettigrew.   

Abstract

Studies of flow in a 90%-stenosis phantom were conducted to elucidate the parameters and mechanisms responsible for signal loss in MR angiographic images. The studies independently evaluated the effect of velocity, Reynolds number, turbulent fluctuation velocity, and turbulence intensity on the amount of post-stenotic signal loss. Results suggested that the magnitude of the turbulent fluctuation velocity, not merely the presence of turbulence or the intensity of turbulence, was the parameter that determined the extent of the signal loss. The study suggests that future flow phantom studies should be conducted with fluids having physiologic velocities and viscosities to obtain accurate levels of turbulent fluctuation velocities and hence reproduce results of in-vivo signal-loss patterns. The mechanism for signal loss is that the temporal and spatial variations of the turbulent fluctuation velocity cause a range of phases to be present within a voxel. Examination of the theoretical aspects of fluid turbulence suggest that shortening gradient durations and imaging during diastole may help reduce signal loss.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7707909     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910330208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  12 in total

1.  Gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries with multiple bolus injection: scan optimization in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  J J Westenberg; M N Wasser; R J van der Geest; P M Pattynama; A de Roos; J Vanderschoot; J H Reiber
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

2.  Stenosis quantification from post-stenotic signal loss in phase-contrast MRA datasets of flow phantoms and renal arteries.

Authors:  J J Westenberg; R J van der Geest; M N Wasser; J Doornbos; P M Pattynama; A de Roos; J Vanderschoot; J H Reiber
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-12

3.  Nonenhanced methods for lower-extremity MRA: a phantom study examining the effects of stenosis and pathologic flow waveforms at 1.5T.

Authors:  Erik J Offerman; Philip A Hodnett; Robert R Edelman; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Four-dimensional flow MRI for evaluation of post-stenotic turbulent flow in a phantom: comparison with flowmeter and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Jihoon Kweon; Dong Hyun Yang; Guk Bae Kim; Namkug Kim; MunYoung Paek; Aurelien F Stalder; Andreas Greiser; Young-Hak Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Quantification of Aortic Regurgitation in Patients With Turbulent Aortic Flow.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lee; Blair Richards; Jimmy C Lu; Maryam Ghadimi Mahani; Adam L Dorfman; Sowmya Balasubramanian; Prachi P Agarwal
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Improvement in visualization of carotid artery uniformity using silent magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Yoshiyuki Muranaka
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-09-08

7.  Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis?

Authors:  Paul J Nederkoorn; Yolanda van der Graaf; Bert C Eikelboom; Aad van der Lugt; Lambertus W Bartels; Willem P T M Mali
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  In vitro validation of finite-element model of AAA hemodynamics incorporating realistic outlet boundary conditions.

Authors:  Ethan O Kung; Andrea S Les; Francisco Medina; Ryan B Wicker; Michael V McConnell; Charles A Taylor
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Comparison of Prospective and Retrospective Gated 4D Flow Cardiac MR Image Acquisitions in the Carotid Bifurcation.

Authors:  Elliott R Hurd; Mengjiao Han; Jason K Mendes; J Rock Hadley; Chris R Johnson; Edward V R DiBella; John N Oshinski; Lucas H Timmins
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.495

10.  Magnetic resonance coronary angiography using navigator echo gated real-time slice following.

Authors:  J N Oshinski; L Hofland; W T Dixon; R I Pettigrew
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.