Literature DB >> 10768743

Stenosis quantification from post-stenotic signal loss in phase-contrast MRA datasets of flow phantoms and renal arteries.

J J Westenberg1, R J van der Geest, M N Wasser, J Doornbos, P M Pattynama, A de Roos, J Vanderschoot, J H Reiber.   

Abstract

In this study a semi-automated and observer-independent algorithm for quantifying post-stenotic signal loss (PSL) in 3D phase-contrast (PC) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of patients with renal artery stenosis is presented. This algorithm was developed on MRA datasets of stenotic phantoms, which were included in a flow circuit with stationary flows. The length and the severity of the PSL (incorporating both length and degree of PSL) in the maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of MRA datasets were proposed for quantifying stenoses. The algorithm was tested in renal arteries of ten patients with renal artery stenosis and seven healthy volunteers. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in the patients and served as the gold standard. Stenosis severity showed better correlation with the severity of the PSL than with the length, both for in vitro as in vivo. Spearman correlation coefficients (rS) showed statistically significant correlations between the severity of the PSL and parameters determined by DSA, i.e. percent diameter stenosis (rS = 0.90). The length of the PSL showed no correlation with the diameter stenosis (rS = 0.37).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10768743     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006329032742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  13 in total

Review 1.  Physical principles and application of magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  J E Siebert; J R Pernicone; E J Potchen
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Mechanisms of flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography.

Authors:  S N Urchuk; D B Plewes
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Normal renal blood flow measurement using phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Sommer; B Noorbehesht; N Pelc; R Jamison; A J Pinevich; L Newton; B Myers
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  The effect of image resolution on vessel signal in high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  D L Parker; D J Parker; D D Blatter; Y P Du; K C Goodrich
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Variations in blood flow waveforms in stenotic renal arteries by 2D phase-contrast cine MRI.

Authors:  J J Westenberg; M N Wasser; R J van der Geest; P M Pattynama; A de Roos; J Vanderschoot; J H Reiber
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  M N Wasser; J Westenberg; V P van der Hulst; J van Baalen; J H van Bockel; A R van Erkel; P M Pattynama
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches.

Authors:  M R Prince; D L Narasimham; J C Stanley; T L Chenevert; D M Williams; M V Marx; K J Cho
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Mechanisms of signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging of stenoses.

Authors:  J C Gatenby; T R McCauley; J C Gore
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Mapping of turbulent intensity by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J C Gatenby; J C Gore
Journal:  J Magn Reson B       Date:  1994-06

10.  Measurement of total and unilateral renal blood flow by oblique-angle velocity-encoded 2D-cine magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  B Lundin; T G Cooper; R A Meyer; E J Potchen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  2 in total

1.  Renal arteries: isotropic, high-spatial-resolution, unenhanced MR angiography with three-dimensional radial phase contrast.

Authors:  Christopher J François; Darren P Lum; Kevin M Johnson; Benjamin R Landgraf; Thorsten A Bley; Scott B Reeder; Mark L Schiebler; Thomas M Grist; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Effects of contour propagation and background corrections in different MRI flow software packages.

Authors:  D Boye; O Springer; F Wassmer; S Scheidegger; L Remonda; J Berberat
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2015-06-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.