Literature DB >> 7706286

Activating and inactivating mutations in N- and C-terminal i3 loop junctions of muscarinic acetylcholine Hm1 receptors.

P Högger1, M S Shockley, J Lameh, W Sadée.   

Abstract

The N- and C-terminal junctions of the third intracellular loop (i3) of G protein-coupled receptors play a role in the coupling process. We had previously constructed two triple point alanine mutants of the i3 junction of the muscarinic Hm1 receptor, W209A/I211A/Y212A and E360A/K362A/T366A, which are defective in mediating carbachol stimulation of phosphatidylinositol (PI) turnover (Moro, O., Lameh, J., Högger, P., and Sadée, W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22273-22276). Each of the corresponding six single point mutations were constructed to determine residues crucial to receptor coupling. Mutants W209A and T366A were similar to or only slightly less effective than wild type Hm1 in stimulating PI turnover. In the N-terminal junction, I211A and Y212A were defective in coupling, and I211A was even more defective than the corresponding triple mutant. Therefore, the triple mutation compensated at least partially for the effect of these two single point mutations. In the C-terminal i3 loop junction, mutant K362A was again more strongly defective than the corresponding triple mutant. In contrast, mutation E360A was found to be activating, leading to elevated PI turnover in the absence of agonist and sensitization toward carbachol activation. Activating mutations in the C-terminal i3 loop junction have been reported previously for the adrenergic receptors, but E360A represents the first muscarinic receptor with substantial basal activity. The effects of the single point mutations observed in this study were not readily predictable from similar mutations from closely related G protein-coupled receptors despite sequence conservation in the i3 loop junctions. Our results caution against defining precise coupling domains in these regions by mutagenesis results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7706286     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.270.13.7405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  19 in total

1.  Dominance of G(s) in doubly G(s)/G(i)-coupled chimaeric A(1)/A(2A) adenosine receptors in HEK-293 cells.

Authors:  A L Tucker; L G Jia; D Holeton; A J Taylor; J Linden
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 2.  Genetic variations in human G protein-coupled receptors: implications for drug therapy.

Authors:  W Sadee; E Hoeg; J Lucas; D Wang
Journal:  AAPS PharmSci       Date:  2001

3.  Differential dynamics in the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin revealed by solution NMR.

Authors:  Judith Klein-Seetharaman; Naveena V K Yanamala; Fathima Javeed; Philip J Reeves; Elena V Getmanova; Michele C Loewen; Harald Schwalbe; H Gobind Khorana
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Differential determinants for coupling of distinct G proteins with the class B secretin receptor.

Authors:  Gene L Garcia; Maoqing Dong; Laurence J Miller
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.249

5.  Ligand-mimicking receptor variant discloses binding and activation mode of prolactin-releasing peptide.

Authors:  Daniel Rathmann; Diana Lindner; Stephanie H DeLuca; Kristian W Kaufmann; Jens Meiler; Annette G Beck-Sickinger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Mechanism of signal propagation upon retinal isomerization: insights from molecular dynamics simulations of rhodopsin restrained by normal modes.

Authors:  Basak Isin; Klaus Schulten; Emad Tajkhorshid; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Review: amino acid domains involved in constitutive activation of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  P J Pauwels; T Wurch
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  Activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors via their allosteric binding sites.

Authors:  J Jakubík; L Bacáková; V Lisá; E E el-Fakahany; S Tucek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Dependence of agonist activation on a conserved apolar residue in the third intracellular loop of the AT1 angiotensin receptor.

Authors:  L Hunyady; M Zhang; G Jagadeesh; M Bor; T Balla; K J Catt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A yeast screening method to decipher the interaction between the adenosine A2B receptor and the C-terminus of different G protein α-subunits.

Authors:  Rongfang Liu; Nick J A Groenewoud; Miriam C Peeters; Eelke B Lenselink; Ad P IJzerman
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.765

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.