Literature DB >> 7704350

A survey of the opinions on 'informed consent' of women currently involved in clinical trials within a breast unit.

A Maslin.   

Abstract

Research indicates there is confusion in the minds of patients and the public surrounding the issue of 'informed consent'. This confusion is compounded when patients are asked to participate in a clinical trial. This study aimed to survey, by self-completed postal questionnaires, the experiences and opinions of 100 randomly selected healthy volunteers not in a clinical trial, 100 healthy volunteers in a clinical trial and 100 breast cancer patients in a clinical trial. A 71% response rate was achieved. The results indicate that there are areas in the current procedure which scored highly and some where improvements could be made. Overall, 72% of respondents indicated they were satisfied with the level of support they are currently receiving. The results also show that healthy volunteers in a clinical trial were better informed about the trial than the corresponding cancer patients. They were given more written information (86% versus 60%, P < 0.005), had a better indication of their time commitment (81% versus 62%, P < 0.025), were better informed of possible physical discomforts (61% versus 43%, P < 0.05), were better informed of possible side-effects (75% versus 57%, P < 0.025) and were more aware of their rights to withdraw from the trial (84% versus 46%, P < 0.005). Patients were also asked for their opinions on their requirements for giving informed consent. The overwhelming majority of the women responding to Questionnaire 2 wanted all the information and support outlined. Only two areas scored below 90%: those were concerned with wanting assurance that all information about the patient will be kept confidential (75%) and those wanting information on protection of the patient's privacy (66%). This response appears to be against the general trend. These results clearly show that most patients require access to a wide range of information prior to consenting to treatment or inclusion in a clinical trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7704350     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1994.tb00037.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  4 in total

1.  Awareness and motivation of Japanese donors of blood for research.

Authors:  T Nakayama; K Muto; N Yoshiike; T Yokoyama
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  What potential research participants want to know about research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen Michelle Kirkby; Melanie Calvert; Heather Draper; Thomas Keeley; Sue Wilson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The perceived severity of a disease and the impact of the vocabulary used to convey information: using Rasch scaling in a simulated oncological scenario.

Authors:  Roberto Burro; Ugo Savardi; Maria Antonietta Annunziata; Paolo De Paoli; Ivana Bianchi
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  What information and the extent of information research participants need in informed consent forms: a multi-country survey.

Authors:  Juntra Karbwang; Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Cristina E Torres; Edlyn B Jimenez; Gurpreet Kaur; Roli Mathur; Eti N Sholikhah; Chandanie Wanigatunge; Chih-Shung Wong; Kwanchanok Yimtae; Murnilina Abdul Malek; Liyana Ahamad Fouzi; Aisyah Ali; Beng Z Chan; Madawa Chandratilake; Shoen C Chiew; Melvyn Y C Chin; Manori Gamage; Irene Gitek; Mohammad Hakimi; Narwani Hussin; Mohd F A Jamil; Pavithra Janarsan; Madarina Julia; Suman Kanungo; Panduka Karunanayake; Sattian Kollanthavelu; Kian K Kong; Bing-Ling Kueh; Ragini Kulkarni; Paul P Kumaran; Ranjith Kumarasiri; Wei H Lim; Xin J Lim; Fatihah Mahmud; Jacinto B V Mantaring; Siti M Md Ali; Nurain Mohd Noor; Kopalasuntharam Muhunthan; Elanngovan Nagandran; Maisarah Noor; Kim H Ooi; Jebananthy A Pradeepan; Ahmad H Sadewa; Nilakshi Samaranayake; Shalini Sri Ranganathan; Wasanthi Subasingha; Sivasangari Subramaniam; Nadirah Sulaiman; Ju F Tay; Leh H Teng; Mei M Tew; Thipaporn Tharavanij; Peter S K Tok; Jayanie Weeratna; Tri Wibawa; Renu Wickremasinghe; Phanthipha Wongwai; Subhash Yadav
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.