Literature DB >> 7697299

Endpoints in cancer clinical trials: is there a need for measuring quality of life?

R Feld1.   

Abstract

A review of the possible reasons to measure quality of life in cancer patients as well as reasons not to measure it is presented. These are considered in the context that standard endpoints already exist in cancer clinical trials and have served us well. Quality-of-life assessments might best be utilized in trials in which survival differences between treatments are expected to be small, which is frequently the case. Although more data are required to establish properly the true value of quality-of-life measurement in cancer clinical trials, such measurements should be encouraged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7697299     DOI: 10.1007/bf00343917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  10 in total

Review 1.  Quality-of-life assessment in cancer treatment protocols: research issues in protocol development.

Authors:  C C Gotay; E L Korn; M S McCabe; T D Moore; B D Cheson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Is there a role for preference assessments in research on quality of life in oncology?

Authors:  J E Till; H J Sutherland; E M Meslin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Quality of life assessment for cost/utility studies in cancer.

Authors:  R M Kaplan
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 4.  Prognostic implications of quality of life.

Authors:  A Coates
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 5.  Guidelines and caveats for quality of life measurement in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  H Schipper
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 6.  Quality of life in cancer: definition, purpose, and method of measurement.

Authors:  D F Cella; D S Tulsky
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies.

Authors:  A Coates; V Gebski; J F Bishop; P N Jeal; R L Woods; R Snyder; M H Tattersall; M Byrne; V Harvey; G Gill
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Quality of life assessment of patients in extremity sarcoma clinical trials.

Authors:  P H Sugarbaker; I Barofsky; S A Rosenberg; F J Gianola
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Estimating the quality of life in a clinical trial of patients with metastatic lung cancer using the Karnofsky performance status and the Functional Living Index--Cancer.

Authors:  P A Ganz; C M Haskell; R A Figlin; N La Soto; J Siau
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  How to compare quality of life of breast cancer patients in clinical trials. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  R D Gelber; B F Cole; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1993
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Quality of life and psychosocial support.

Authors:  A Kiss
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Does intubated uretero-ureterocutaneostomy provide better health-related quality of life than orthotopic neobladder in patients after radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer?

Authors:  Ioannis Vakalopoulos; Georgios Dimitriadis; Anastasios Anastasiadis; Georgios Gkotsos; Demetrios Radopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Problems eliciting cues in SEIQoL-DW: quality of life areas in small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Marjan Westerman; Tony Hak; Anne-Mei The; Harry Groen; Gerrit van der Wal
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Conducting routine fatigue assessments for use in clinical oncology practice: patient and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Kimberly M Davis; Jin-Shei Lai; Elizabeth A Hahn; David Cella
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Psychometric- and quality-of-life assessment in long-term glioblastoma survivors.

Authors:  Manuela Schmidinger; Leo Linzmayer; Alexander Becherer; Barbara Fazeny-Doemer; Negar Fakhrai; Daniela Prayer; Monika Killer; Karl Ungersboeck; Karin Dieckmann; Christine Marosi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Deterioration in quality of life (QoL) in patients with malignant ascites: results from a phase II/III study comparing paracentesis plus catumaxomab with paracentesis alone.

Authors:  P Wimberger; H Gilet; A-K Gonschior; M M Heiss; M Moehler; G Oskay-Oezcelik; S-E Al-Batran; B Schmalfeldt; A Schmittel; E Schulze; S L Parsons
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Individualized quality of life, standardized quality of life, and distress in patients undergoing a phase I trial of the novel therapeutic Reolysin (reovirus).

Authors:  Linda E Carlson; Barry D Bultz; Donald G Morris
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.