Literature DB >> 3276389

Estimating the quality of life in a clinical trial of patients with metastatic lung cancer using the Karnofsky performance status and the Functional Living Index--Cancer.

P A Ganz1, C M Haskell, R A Figlin, N La Soto, J Siau.   

Abstract

Serial assessments of Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and of the Functional Living Index--Cancer (FLIC) have been used to estimate the quality of life (QOL) of patients in a prospective, randomized trial of supportive care versus supportive care given with combination chemotherapy to patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. There was a good correlation between KPS and FLIC scores at study entry, thus confirming results originally reported using the FLIC. However, a number of unexpected problems were encountered in data collection and quality control with this QOL assessment instrument. This made it impossible to look for differences in treatment effect on QOL in this clinical trial. It is believed that QOL assessment should be an integral part of cancer clinical trials; however, investigators must acknowledge the difficulties in collecting this type of data. The development of new instruments and the refinement of old ones will facilitate the collection of data for this important aspect of clinical trials research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3276389     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880215)61:4<849::aid-cncr2820610435>3.0.co;2-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  42 in total

1.  Quality of life in patients with stable disease after surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for malignant brain tumour.

Authors:  A R Giovagnoli
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Temporal assessment of quality of life of head and neck cancer patients receiving radical radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Chawla; B K Mohanti; M Rakshak; S Saxena; G K Rath; S Bahadur
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Partial responses to antineoplastic drug therapy: what do they mean?

Authors:  M Markman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Economic and quality-of-life aspects of treating small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P Graham; J Boyages
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Understanding health-related quality of life in adult women with metastatic cancer who have dependent children.

Authors:  Eliza M Park; Allison M Deal; Justin M Yopp; Teresa Edwards; Samuel J Resnick; Mi-Kyung Song; Zev M Nakamura; Donald L Rosenstein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-05-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Quality of life measurement for patients undergoing treatment for lung cancer.

Authors:  R J Fergusson; A Cull
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Pain, depression, and fatigue in community-dwelling adults with and without a history of cancer.

Authors:  Cielito C Reyes-Gibby; Lu Ann Aday; Karen O Anderson; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Approaches to the analysis of quality of life data: experiences gained from a medical research council lung cancer working party palliative chemotherapy trial.

Authors:  P Hopwood; R J Stephens; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Endpoints in cancer clinical trials: is there a need for measuring quality of life?

Authors:  R Feld
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Employment following chemoradiotherapy in glioblastoma: a prospective case series.

Authors:  Cecelia Gzell; H Wheeler; L Guo; M Kastelan; M Back
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.