Literature DB >> 7696567

Hydrogen exchange studies of the Arc repressor: evidence for a monomeric folding intermediate.

M J Burgering1, M Hald, R Boelens, J N Breg, R Kaptein.   

Abstract

The hydrogen exchange rates of the backbone amide and labile side-chain protons of the dimeric Arc repressor have been measured. For the slowly exchanging amides in the alpha-helical regions, these rates show a concentration dependence. To account for this dependence, the role of the monomer-dimer equilibrium was considered. Extrapolating the observed exchange rates to zero dimer concentration provides estimates of these rates in the monomer and shows that they are significantly retarded compared to those of an unfolded polypeptide. This suggests that the monomer is in a structured "molten globule" like state. In particular, the two helices of Arc retain a high degree of their secondary structure and it is proposed that the two amphiphilic helices are packed together with their hydrophobic faces. Evidence for a partially folded structure in the Arc monomer was reported earlier in two other studies [J. L. Silva, C. F. Silveira, A. Correia, Jr., and L. Pontes (1992) Journal of Molecular Biology, Vol. 223, pp. 545-555; X. Peng, J. Jonas, and J. L. Silva (1993) Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, Vol. 90, pp. 1776-1780]. By combining the results of these studies and ours, a folding pathway of the dimeric Arc repressor involving four different stages is proposed. Due to the low concentration of Arc repressor in the cell, the protein is present either as a free monomer or it is bound to DNA presumably as a tetramer. Therefore the folding pathway can be regarded as an integral part of the overall DNA binding process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7696567     DOI: 10.1002/bip.360350210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopolymers        ISSN: 0006-3525            Impact factor:   2.505


  6 in total

1.  Effects of protein stability and structure on substrate processing by the ClpXP unfolding and degradation machine.

Authors:  R E Burton; S M Siddiqui; Y I Kim; T A Baker; R T Sauer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Why is protein folding so fast?

Authors:  R L Baldwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Barriers to protein folding: formation of buried polar interactions is a slow step in acquisition of structure.

Authors:  C D Waldburger; T Jonsson; R T Sauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Probing the equilibrium unfolding of ketosteroid isomerase through xenon-perturbed 1H-15N multidimensional NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hyeong Ju Lee; Hye Seon Moon; Do Soo Jang; Hyung Jin Cha; Bee Hak Hong; Kwan Yong Choi; Hee Cheon Lee
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Wiggle-predicting functionally flexible regions from primary sequence.

Authors:  Jenny Gu; Michael Gribskov; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  The p53 core domain is a molten globule at low pH: functional implications of a partially unfolded structure.

Authors:  Ana Paula D Ano Bom; Monica S Freitas; Flavia S Moreira; Danielly Ferraz; Daniel Sanches; Andre M O Gomes; Ana Paula Valente; Yraima Cordeiro; Jerson L Silva
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.