Literature DB >> 7695326

Antifungal susceptibility testing of isolates from a randomized, multicenter trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B as treatment of nonneutropenic patients with candidemia. NIAID Mycoses Study Group and the Candidemia Study Group.

J H Rex1, M A Pfaller, A L Barry, P W Nelson, C D Webb.   

Abstract

The antifungal susceptibilities of 232 pathogenic blood stream Candida isolates collected during a recently completed trial comparing fluconazole (400 mg/day) with amphotericin B (0.5 mg/kg of body weight per day) as treatment for candidemia in the nonneutropenic patient were determined both by the National committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-P macrobroth methodology and by a less cumbersome broth microdilution methodology. For amphotericin B, M27-P yielded a very narrow range of MICs (0.125 to 1 microgram/ml) and there were no susceptibility differences among species. For fluconazole, a broad range of MICs were seen (0.125 to > 64 micrograms/ml), with characteristic MICs seen for each species in the rank order Candida albicans < C. parapsilosis approximately equal to C. lusitaniae < C. glabrata approximately equal to C. krusei approximately equal to C. lipolytica. The MIC distribution for C. tropicalis was bimodal and could not be ranked. Both microdilution MICs were within one tube dilution of the M27-P MIC for > 90% of isolates with amphotericin B and for > or = 77% of isolates with fluconazole. For both methods, elevated MICs did not predict treatment failure. In the case of amphotericin B, the MIC range was too narrow to permit identification of resistant isolates. In the case of fluconazole, MICs for isolates associated with failure to clear the bloodstream consistently were equivalent to the median MIC for the given species. Successful courses of therapy were seen with four isolates from four patients despite MICs of > or = 32 micrograms/ml. As MICs obtained by M27-P and similar methods correlate with responsiveness to fluconazole therapy in animal models and in AIDS patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis, the lack of correlation in this setting suggests that the MICs for these isolates are at or below the relevant fluconazole breakpoint for this dose of fluconazole and patient setting and that host factors such as failure to exchange intravenous catheters were more important than MIC in predicting outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7695326      PMCID: PMC162481          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.39.1.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  12 in total

1.  Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; C W Kish; T M Kerkering; R A Fromtling; K Bartizal; J N Galgiani; K Villareal; M A Pfaller; T Gerarden; M G Rinaldi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Resistance of Candida albicans to fluconazole during treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in a patient with AIDS: documentation by in vitro susceptibility testing and DNA subtype analysis.

Authors:  S Redding; J Smith; G Farinacci; M Rinaldi; A Fothergill; J Rhine-Chalberg; M Pfaller
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Selection criteria for an antimicrobial susceptibility testing system.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Antifungal susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J H Rex; M A Pfaller; M G Rinaldi; A Polak; J N Galgiani
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Comparative evaluation of alternative methods for broth dilution susceptibility testing of fluconazole against Candida albicans.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; C Grant; V Morthland; J Rhine-Chalberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  In vitro veritas? Antimicrobial susceptibility tests and their clinical relevance.

Authors:  D Greenwood
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Correlation between in vitro susceptibility of Candida albicans and fluconazole-resistant oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  N Troillet; C Durussel; J Bille; M P Glauser; J P Chave
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts.

Authors:  R A Fromtling; J N Galgiani; M A Pfaller; A Espinel-Ingroff; K F Bartizal; M S Bartlett; B A Body; C Frey; G Hall; G D Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Fluconazole-resistant recurrent oral candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients: persistence of Candida albicans strains with the same genotype.

Authors:  L Millon; A Manteaux; G Reboux; C Drobacheff; M Monod; T Barale; Y Michel-Briand
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of a novel colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; A L Barry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  90 in total

1.  Candida isolates from neonates: frequency of misidentification and reduced fluconazole susceptibility.

Authors:  J L Rowen; J M Tate; N Nordoff; L Passarell; M R McGinnis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Management of Infections Caused by Candida glabrata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole by flow cytometry correlates with clinical outcome.

Authors:  C Wenisch; C B Moore; R Krause; E Presterl; P Pichna; D W Denning
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Multicenter randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients. Canadian Candidemia Study Group.

Authors:  P Phillips; S Shafran; G Garber; C Rotstein; F Smaill; I Fong; I Salit; M Miller; K Williams; J M Conly; J Singer; S Ioannou
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Sequential treatment of deep fungal infections with amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion.

Authors:  B Beović; T Lejko-Zupanc; J Pretnar
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Candiduria: When and How to Treat It.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Emerging Issues in Nosocomial Fungal Infections.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 8.  Progress in antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. by use of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods, 2010 to 2012.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Interpretive breakpoints for fluconazole and Candida revisited: a blueprint for the future of antifungal susceptibility testing.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema; D J Sheehan
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  In vitro and in vivo effects of 14alpha-demethylase (ERG11) depletion in Candida glabrata.

Authors:  H Nakayama; N Nakayama; M Arisawa; Y Aoki
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.