Literature DB >> 7694976

A simple classification of lymph node level in gastric carcinoma.

Y Adachi1, T Oshiro, T Okuyama, T Kamakura, M Mori, Y Maehara, K Sugimachi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because insufficient lymph node examination can cause erroneous listing of earlier-nodal-stage gastric carcinoma (stage migration phenomenon), surgical results must be evaluated based on a highly accurate examination of the dissected lymph nodes. To establish a simple and useful classification of lymph node level, we analyzed the frequency and distribution of lymph node metastasis by using curatively treated node-positive gastric carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Various clinicopathologic data were analyzed with reference to the degree of lymph node metastasis by using 240 patients with curatively resected node-positive gastric carcinoma. The cases were divided into the following three groups: 142 with positive level I (perigastric) nodes, 71 with positive level II (intermediate) nodes, and 27 with positive level III (distant) nodes, irrespective of the location of tumors.
RESULTS: The level of lymph node metastasis clearly correlated with the survival of patients, with the 5-year survival rates for level I, II, and III cases being 67%, 35%, and 26%, respectively (P < 0.01). The degree of lymph node metastasis was determined by the number of positive nodes (P < 0.01), the depth of invasion (P < 0.01), the size of tumors (P < 0.01), and the location of tumors (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: This simple classification of lymph node level (level I, II, and III) is useful for the evaluation and prediction of surgical results in gastric carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7694976     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80181-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients.

Authors:  M S Karpeh; L Leon; D Klimstra; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Subtotal versus total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: five-year survival rates in a multicenter randomized Italian trial. Italian Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group.

Authors:  F Bozzetti; E Marubini; G Bonfanti; R Miceli; C Piano; L Gennari
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Prognostic discrimination of subgrouping node-positive endometrioid uterine cancer: location vs nodal extent.

Authors:  D S Kapp; T K Kiet; J K Chan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Lymph nodes may be a source for immunetherapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Paula Baraúna Assumpção; Erika Couto Canelas; Aline Cruz Ramos; Ana Anaissi; João Felipe Acioli; Geraldo Ishak; Sidney Santos; Samia Demachki; Paulo Assumpção
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-05-12

5.  Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease-specific mortality in gastric cancer-A competing risk analysis.

Authors:  Etsuro Bando; Xinge Ji; Michael W Kattan; Maria Bencivenga; Giovanni de Manzoni; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.