Literature DB >> 7686196

Immunocytochemical identification of basic fibroblast growth factor in the developing rat mammary gland: variations in location are dependent on glandular structure and differentiation.

P S Rudland1, A M Platt-Higgins, M C Wilkinson, D G Fernig.   

Abstract

We raised antiserum to human recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor (rbFGF) in rabbits. With this affinity-purified antiserum, other antisera to rbFGF, and commercial antiserum to bovine pituitary bFGF, we undertook immunocytochemical detection of bFGF in histological sections of rat mammary glands at different developmental stages. In non-growing ducts, anti-bFGF serum stains the basement membrane/myoepithelial cells, whereas in serial sections most of this stain is observed to be associated with anti-laminin-staining basement membranes rather than with anti-callus-keratin-staining myoepithelial cells. The weak staining of the myoepithelial cells is enhanced when NiCl2 is included in the detection system, but little staining for bFGF is observed in the epithelial cells. In growing neonatal ducts from 1-day-old rats, in growing terminal end buds (TEBs) and, to a lesser extent, in growing alveolar buds (ABs) in prepubescent (21-day) and pubescent (50-day) rats, both their inner and outer cells are stained moderately by anti-bFGF sera. In non-growing ducts from rats aged 6 days, in non-growing ABs of rats aged 60 days and more, and in alveoli from pregnant and lactating rats, only the basement membrane/myoepithelial cell area is stained by anti-bFGF sera; the epithelial cells are unstained. Staining of the myoepithelial cells is enhanced by mixtures of rbFGF and anti-bFGF sera in non-growing ducts, but there is little change in the staining of growing TEBs. All staining by anti-bFGF sera is abolished with heparin in the reactions. We suggest that the immunoreactive bFGF is present mainly bound to heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans in the basement membrane of resting structures, but that immunoreactive bFGF becomes associated with proliferating cells, particularly those intermediate in characteristics between epithelial and myoepithelial cells in growing structures such as TEBs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7686196     DOI: 10.1177/41.6.7686196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  10 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of mammary gland growth and morphogenesis by the mammary fat pad: a species comparison.

Authors:  R C Hovey; T B McFadden; R M Akers
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 2.  Stem cells and the stem cell niche in the breast: an integrated hormonal and developmental perspective.

Authors:  Cathrin Brisken; Stephan Duss
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 3.  Proteoglycans: pericellular and cell surface multireceptors that integrate external stimuli in the mammary gland.

Authors:  M Delehedde; M Lyon; N Sergeant; H Rahmoune; D G Fernig
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Structure and epitope distribution of heparan sulfate is disrupted in experimental lung hypoplasia: a glycobiological epigenetic cause for malformation?

Authors:  Sophie M Thompson; Marilyn G Connell; Toin H van Kuppevelt; Ruoyan Xu; Jeremy E Turnbull; Paul D Losty; David G Fernig; Edwin C Jesudason
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 1.978

5.  Heparan sulfate phage display antibodies identify distinct epitopes with complex binding characteristics: insights into protein binding specificities.

Authors:  Sophie M Thompson; David G Fernig; Edwin C Jesudason; Paul D Losty; Els M A van de Westerlo; Toin H van Kuppevelt; Jeremy E Turnbull
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  An in vitro model of epithelial cell growth stimulation in the rodent mammary gland.

Authors:  U K Ehmann; J T DeVries; M S C Chen; A A Adamos; R C Guzman; M B Omary
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 7.  Joining S100 proteins and migration: for better or for worse, in sickness and in health.

Authors:  Stephane R Gross; Connie Goh Then Sin; Roger Barraclough; Philip S Rudland
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Myoepithelial cells: good fences make good neighbors.

Authors:  Melissa C Adriance; Jamie L Inman; Ole W Petersen; Mina J Bissell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Comparative expression of fibroblast growth factor mRNAs in benign and malignant breast disease.

Authors:  S Y Anandappa; J H Winstanley; S Leinster; B Green; P S Rudland; R Barraclough
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Selectivity in glycosaminoglycan binding dictates the distribution and diffusion of fibroblast growth factors in the pericellular matrix.

Authors:  Changye Sun; Marco Marcello; Yong Li; David Mason; Raphaël Lévy; David G Fernig
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.