Literature DB >> 7684999

Significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy.

M H Weinstein1, J I Epstein.   

Abstract

We studied 33 cases with an initial needle biopsy of the prostate that showed only high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN 2-3), for which follow-up biopsies were available. Twenty-four men (73%) were shown to have adenocarcinoma either on a simultaneous (14 patients) or subsequent (10 patients) biopsy. The grade of PIN (grade 2 v 3), rectal examination findings, and transrectal ultrasound results proved not to be significantly different in patients with proven adenocarcinoma compared with those without proven carcinoma. In contrast, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations were elevated in 90% of patients with carcinoma compared with only 50% of those with a benign follow-up biopsy. Persistent elevation of serum PSA concentration was seen in only one of three patients with serial PSA measurements and a benign follow-up biopsy. Notably, all patients with carcinoma for whom we had serial measurements of serum PSA levels had persistent elevation. The finding of high-grade PIN on needle biopsy often represents a sampling problem with carcinoma nearby. Consequently, the finding of high-grade PIN on needle biopsy merits vigorous follow-up, including rebiopsy. In particular, patients with increased serum PSA appear to be at greater risk of harboring prostatic adenocarcinoma. However, a significant number of patients with high-grade PIN on initial biopsy may not have evidence of carcinoma on repeat biopsy. Thus, radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for PIN is not warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7684999     DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90242-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  14 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer prevention: review of target populations, pathological biomarkers, and chemopreventive agents.

Authors:  R Montironi; R Mazzucchelli; J R Marshall; P H Bartels
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  20-year-old male with recurrent right flank pain.

Authors:  Ojas Shah; Brian R Matlaga; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

3.  Is repeat biopsy for isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia necessary?

Authors:  Arnold I Chin; Dhiren S Dave; Jacob Rajfer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

Review 4.  Precursor lesions for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M R Feneley; C Busch
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Recommendations for the reporting of resected prostate carcinomas.

Authors:  R E Fechner
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Initial high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with carcinoma on subsequent prostate needle biopsy: findings at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Turki O Al-Hussain; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: an overview.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

8.  Drug therapies for eradicating high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in the prevention of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 9.  The significance of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia for the development of prostate carcinoma. An update.

Authors:  B G Helpap; D G Bostwick; R Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Prostate cancer old problems and new approaches : Part I. epidemiology, incidence and genetic alterations.

Authors:  K V Honn; A Aref; Y Q Chen; M L Cher; J D Crissman; J D Forman; X Gao; D Grignon; M Hussain; A T Porter; J E Pontes; I Powell; B Redman; W Sakr; R Severson; D G Tang; D P Wood
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.