Literature DB >> 7677796

Measurement and analysis of static magnetic fields that block action potentials in cultured neurons.

A V Cavopol1, A W Wamil, R R Holcomb, M J McLean.   

Abstract

To characterize the properties of static magnetic fields on firing of action potentials (AP) by sensory neurons in cell culture, we developed a mathematical formalism based on the expression for the magnetic field of a single circular current loop. The calculated fields fit closely the field measurements taken with a Hall effect gaussmeter. The biological effect induced by different arrays of permanent magnets depended principally on the spatial variation of the fields, quantified by the value of the gradient of the field magnitude. Magnetic arrays of different sizes (macroarray: four center-charged neodymium magnets of approximately 14 mm diameter; microarray; four micromagnets of the same material but of approximately 0.4 mm diameter) allowed comparison of fields with similar gradients but different intensities at the cell position. These two arrays had a common gradient value of approximately 1 mT/mm and blocked > 70% of AP. Alternatively, cells placed in a field strength of approximately 0.2 mT and a gradient of approximately 0.02 mT/mm produced by the macroarray resulted in no significant reduction of firing; a microarray field of the same strength but with a higher gradient of approximately 1.5 mT/mm caused approximately 80% AP blockade. The experimental threshold gradient and the calculated threshold field intensity for blockade of action potentials by these arrays were estimated to be approximately 0.02 mT/mm and approximately 0.02 mT, respectively, In conclusion, these findings suggest that spatial variation of the magnetic field is the principal cause of AP blockade in dorsal root ganglia in vitro.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7677796     DOI: 10.1002/bem.2250160308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  9 in total

1.  Flexible magnets are not effective in decreasing pain perception and recovery time after muscle microinjury.

Authors:  P A Borsa; C L Liggett
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Therapeutic Magnets Do Not Affect Tissue Temperatures.

Authors:  Kathleen B. Sweeney; Mark A. Merrick; Christopher D. Ingersoll; John A. Swez
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Recovery Effects of a 180 mT Static Magnetic Field on Bone Mineral Density of Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae in Ovariectomized Rats.

Authors:  Shenzhi Xu; Hideyuki Okano; Naohide Tomita; Yoshito Ikada
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Static magnetic field stimulation of the supplementary motor area modulates resting-state activity and motor behavior.

Authors:  José A Pineda-Pardo; Ignacio Obeso; Pasqualina Guida; Michele Dileone; Bryan A Strange; José A Obeso; Antonio Oliviero; Guglielmo Foffani
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-10-31

5.  Exploring the role of the left DLPFC in fatigue during unresisted rhythmic movements.

Authors:  Aranza Vila-Villar; Mariña Naya-Fernández; Antonio Madrid; Elena Madinabeitia-Mancebo; Verónica Robles-García; Javier Cudeiro; Pablo Arias
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.348

6.  Non-invasive modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials by the application of static magnetic fields over the primary and supplementary motor cortices.

Authors:  Hikari Kirimoto; Akihiko Asao; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Astroglial Isopotentiality and Calcium-Associated Biomagnetic Field Effects on Cortical Neuronal Coupling.

Authors:  Marcos Martinez-Banaclocha
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Modulation of Sleep Architecture by Whole-Body Static Magnetic Exposure: A Study Based on EEG-Based Automatic Sleep Staging.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Haoyu Jiang; Xiaotong Ding; Zhongcai Liao; Min Wei; Juan Li; Tongning Wu; Congsheng Li; Yanwen Fang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Mapping of static magnetic fields near the surface of mobile phones.

Authors:  L Zastko; L Makinistian; A Tvarožná; F L Ferreyra; I Belyaev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.