Literature DB >> 7677600

Gender-, side- and site-dependent variations in human perioral spatial resolution.

C C Chen1, G K Essick, D G Kelly, M G Young, J M Nestor, B Masse.   

Abstract

Twenty-eight right-handed, young adults participated in a sensory testing experiment to evaluate spatial resolution at 10 positionally matched sites on the right- and left-hand sides of the face. An adaptive psychophysical (i.e. tracking) procedure was used to estimate the threshold spatial separation for perceiving two points of contact at each site. Estimates of the threshold at one site on both sides of the face were also obtained with a method-of-limits procedure similar to that employed for clinical evaluation of patients. In addition, each individual was asked to rate (i) his(her) overall facial sensitivity to touch and (ii) the degree to which he(she) could discern subtle changes in lip, cheek and chin position during speech, chewing and facial expression. Analysis of the estimates of the threshold separation obtained with the tracking procedure revealed a significant effect of gender (p < 0.04) and of site (p < 0.001). Females were more spatially sensitive than males: average threshold separations were 1.55 mm less. Most notably, the threshold increased ninefold with distance posterolaterally from the oral opening. The vermilion of the upper lip was the most spatially sensitive site (population geometric mean = 2.4 mm) and the preauricular skin the least spatially sensitive site (20.9 mm). Significant effects of side and of interactions among gender, side and site were not observed. The estimates obtained with the method-of-limits procedure were very similar to those obtained with the tracking procedure: the latter were 0.67 mm less on the average. Individuals' ratings of overall facial sensitivity to touch were similar for males and females (p > 0.70). Females, however, reported greater ability to discern subtle changes in lip, cheek and chin position than males (p < 0.03). The ratings of this sensory function correlated negatively with the estimates of the threshold separation on the vermilion of the upper lip (p < 0.03).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7677600     DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(94)00202-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  10 in total

1.  Mechanical frequency and stimulation-site-related differences in vibrotactile detection capacity along the lip vermilion in young adults.

Authors:  R D Andreatta; J H Davidow
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effects of lip revision surgery on long-term orosensory function in patients with cleft lip/palate.

Authors:  Greg Essick; Ceib Phillips; Yunro Chung; Carroll-Ann Trotman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2012-08-20

3.  Facial altered sensation and sensory impairment after orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  G K Essick; C Phillips; T A Turvey; M Tucker
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part IV: Between- and within-participant variables affecting lip vermilion sensory thresholds.

Authors:  Greg K Essick; Ceib Phillips; Carroll-Ann Trotman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2007-11

5.  Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part I: Study design and surgeon ratings of lip disability and need for lip revision.

Authors:  Carroll-Ann Trotman; Ceib Phillips; Greg K Essick; Julian J Faraway; Steven M Barlow; H Wolfgang Losken; John van Aalst; Lyna Rogers
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2007-11

6.  Effect of facial sensory re-training on sensory thresholds.

Authors:  G K Essick; C Phillips; J Zuniga
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Impact of cognitive function on oral perception in independently living older people.

Authors:  Motoyoshi Fukutake; Taiji Ogawa; Kazunori Ikebe; Yusuke Mihara; Chisato Inomata; Hajime Takeshita; Kenichi Matsuda; Kodai Hatta; Yasuyuki Gondo; Yukie Masui; Hiroki Inagaki; Yasumichi Arai; Kei Kamide; Tatsuro Ishizaki; Yoshinobu Maeda
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Two-point discrimination values vary depending on test site, sex and test modality in the orofacial region: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Sang-Yeun Won; Hye-Kyoung Kim; Mee-Eun Kim; Ki-Suk Kim
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Visual and somatosensory information contribute to distortions of the body model.

Authors:  Valeria Peviani; Lucia Melloni; Gabriella Bottini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Tactile spatial discrimination on the torso using vibrotactile and force stimulation.

Authors:  Atena Fadaei Jouybari; Matteo Franza; Oliver Alan Kannape; Masayuki Hara; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.