Literature DB >> 18177194

Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part IV: Between- and within-participant variables affecting lip vermilion sensory thresholds.

Greg K Essick1, Ceib Phillips, Carroll-Ann Trotman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Compare neurosensory assessments for participants with and without a cleft lip; identify between- and within-participant variables affecting sensory thresholds on the vermilion of participants with cleft lip.
DESIGN: A parallel group, nonrandomized clinical trial.
SUBJECTS: There were 56 participants with cleft lip and 37 noncleft participants. ANALYSIS: Two-point perception and warmth and cool detection thresholds were measured on the right and left sides of the upper and lower vermilion. A cotton-tip stick, stroked across the skin, was used to identify altered sensation. Linear mixed effects modeling was used to examine the effects of between- and within-participant variables on the thresholds.
RESULTS: Threshold values on the upper and lower vermilion were similar for cleft and noncleft participants and were unaffected by the presence of a cleft on the side tested. Participants with cleft lip who reported hyposensitive altered sensations had higher two-point thresholds on the upper lip than those who reported hypersensitivity. Participants with cleft lip who reported altered midface sensation had lower warmth detection, but higher cool detection thresholds, on the lower vermilion than participants with cleft lip who did not report altered sensation. Participants with bilateral cleft lip had lower warmth detection thresholds on the upper vermilion than participants with unilateral cleft lip.
CONCLUSIONS: Although participants with cleft lip and noncleft participants exhibit similar thermal and two-point discrimination, on average, differences exist among subgroups of participants with cleft lip that may reflect central disturbances in the processing of somatosensory stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18177194      PMCID: PMC3681524          DOI: 10.1597/06-129.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  27 in total

1.  Normal values for the two-point discrimination test.

Authors:  E B Cope; J H Antony
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 2.  Cleft lip (+/- cleft palate) etiology: a search for solutions.

Authors:  M Melnick
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1992-01-01

3.  Low-threshold mechanoreceptive afferents in the human lingual nerve.

Authors:  M Trulsson; G K Essick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Facial sensibility in adolescents born with cleft lip after undergoing repair in infancy.

Authors:  J C Posnick; M M al-Qattan; G E Pron; J A Grossman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Evaluation of two-point discrimination in children: reliability, effects of passive displacement and voluntary movements.

Authors:  C Menier; R Forget; J Lambert
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.449

6.  Facial sensibility in adolescents with and without clefts 1 year after undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy.

Authors:  J C Posnick; M M al-Qattan; G Pron
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  The neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) as a regulator of cell-cell interactions.

Authors:  U Rutishauser; A Acheson; A K Hall; D M Mann; J Sunshine
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Method for quantitative estimation of thermal thresholds in patients.

Authors:  H Fruhstorfer; U Lindblom; W C Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans.

Authors:  R W Van Boven; K O Johnson
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Gender-, side- and site-dependent variations in human perioral spatial resolution.

Authors:  C C Chen; G K Essick; D G Kelly; M G Young; J M Nestor; B Masse
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.633

View more
  4 in total

1.  Marked Variation Exists Among Surgeons and Hospitals in the Use of Secondary Cleft Lip Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas J Sitzman; Adam C Carle; Jaclyn N Lundberg; Pamela C Heaton; Michael A Helmrath; Carroll-Ann Trotman; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2019-10-09

2.  Effects of lip revision surgery on long-term orosensory function in patients with cleft lip/palate.

Authors:  Greg Essick; Ceib Phillips; Yunro Chung; Carroll-Ann Trotman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2012-08-20

3.  Facial altered sensation and sensory impairment after orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  G K Essick; C Phillips; T A Turvey; M Tucker
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Magnetoencephalographic evaluation of repaired lip sensation in patients with cleft lip.

Authors:  Chihiro Kitayama; Eriya Shimada; Hiroki Hihara; Akitake Kanno; Nobukazu Nakasato; Yoshimichi Imai; Akimitsu Sato; Ryuta Kawashima; Kaoru Igarashi; Hiroyasu Kanetaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.