Literature DB >> 7676783

Continuous cardiac output measurements in the perioperative period.

C J Jakobsen1, N C Melsen, E B Andresen.   

Abstract

Management of critically ill patients is based on knowledge of fundamental physiologic variables. Automatized and continuous measurement of these variables is preferable. A new system based upon the thermodilution method has been developed to measure cardiac output automatically and continuously. We evaluated the system in the potentially unstable perioperative period with possible great and rapid changes in cardiac output. Twenty patients, scheduled for open heart or abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, were included in the study, which was approved by the local ethical committee. The patients were monitored up to 30 hours. At random intervals five, iced, bolus thermodilution cardiac output (BCO) determinations were made and compared to the continuous cardiac output measurements (CCO). Two hundred and thirty-one pairs of data were obtained. The cardiac outputs ranged from 2.5-14.9 l.min-1. The absolute bias was 0.31 l.min-1 (95% limits of agreement -14 l.min-1 to 2.0 l.min-1). The mean relative error was 4.7% with a standard deviation of the relative error of 15.4%. The linear regression was represented by: CCO = 1,1352.BCO-0.36. The correlation coefficient R was 0.90 (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the CCO measurement technique is a promising clinical method. The method is straightforward, requires no calibration, is independent of vascular geometry and measures with its limitations volumetric flow. Finally automatic and continuous patient monitoring provides more information and has potential to reveal previously undetected haemodynamic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7676783     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1995.tb04104.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  6 in total

Review 1.  Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Bart F Geerts; Leon P Aarts; Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients: comparison of continuous and conventional thermodilution techniques.

Authors:  J Y Lefrant; P Bruelle; J Ripart; F Ibanez; G Aya; P Peray; G Saïssi; J E de La Coussaye; J J Eledjam
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Comparison of two methods for enhanced continuous circulatory monitoring in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  F Spöhr; P Hettrich; H Bauer; U Haas; E Martin; B W Böttiger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Agreement between continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karim Kouz; Frederic Michard; Alina Bergholz; Christina Vokuhl; Luisa Briesenick; Phillip Hoppe; Moritz Flick; Gerhard Schön; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies--with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes; Jan Poloniecki; Giorgio Della Rocca; R Michael Grounds
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Non-invasive cardiac output measurement with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing liver transplantation: comparison of an invasive method with pulmonary thermodilution.

Authors:  De-Jie Wang; I-Shan Lee; An-Hsun Chou; Chun-Yu Chen; Pei-Chi Ting; Yun-Hui Teng; Jr-Rung Lin; Hsin-I Tsai
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.