Literature DB >> 7674662

Quantifying the relation between speech quality and speech intelligibility.

J E Preminger1, D J Van Tasell.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present research was to examine the relation between speech quality and speech intelligibility. Speech quality measurements were made using continuous discourse and a category rating procedure for the following dimensions: intelligibility, pleasantness, loudness, effort, and total impression. Measurements were made using a group of listeners with normal hearing for a set of stimulus conditions in which intelligibility varied, and for a set of stimulus conditions in which intelligibility was held constant near 100%. When ratings were made for a set of stimulus conditions in which intelligibility was allowed to vary (a) intersubject reliability was high (i.e., different listeners interpreted the dimensions in a similar manner); and (b) the speech quality dimensions of intelligibility, effort, and loudness were indistinguishable. When ratings were made for a set of stimulus conditions in which intelligibility was held constant (a) intersubject reliability was reduced, indicating that different listeners interpreted the dimensions in different ways; (b) most listeners rated each dimension differently, indicating that the dimensions were unique; and (c) across listeners, no single dimension was highly correlated with total impression. These results can be used in order to examine the relation between speech quality and speech intelligibility.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7674662     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3803.714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  9 in total

1.  Integrating cognitive and peripheral factors in predicting hearing-aid processing effectiveness.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Automatic intelligibility classification of sentence-level pathological speech.

Authors:  Jangwon Kim; Naveen Kumar; Andreas Tsiartas; Ming Li; Shrikanth S Narayanan
Journal:  Comput Speech Lang       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.899

3.  Amplification Self-Adjustment: Controls and Repeatability.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd; Jennifer Retana; Carol L Mackersie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

5.  [Numeric quantification of intelligibility in schoolchildren with isolated and combined cleft palate].

Authors:  B Vogt; A Maier; A Batliner; E Nöth; E Nkenke; U Eysholdt; M Schuster
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Exploring the limits of frequency lowering.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kathryn H Arehart; James M Kates; Naomi B H Croghan; Namita Gehani
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality.

Authors:  Elke M J Devocht; A Miranda L Janssen; Josef Chalupper; Robert J Stokroos; Erwin L J George
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Perceived Sound Quality Dimensions Influencing Frequency-Gain Shaping Preferences for Hearing Aid-Amplified Speech and Music.

Authors:  Jonathan M Vaisberg; Steve Beaulac; Danielle Glista; Ewan A Macpherson; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Can Dual Compression Offer Better Mandarin Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality Than Fast-Acting Compression?

Authors:  Yuan Chen; Lena L N Wong; Volker Kuehnel; Jinyu Qian; Solveig Christina Voss; Wang Shangqiguo
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.