Literature DB >> 7673439

Cranioplasty: indications, technique, and early results of autogenous split skull cranial vault reconstruction.

C Lee1, O M Antonyshyn, C R Forrest.   

Abstract

Since 1990, fresh autogenous split skull cranioplasty has been the preferred method of reconstructing complicated cranial defects at the Sunnybrook Hospital. Eight cases of split skull cranioplasties were reviewed to illustrate the indications and technical considerations of the procedure. Clinical factors believed to be detrimental to the outcome of split skull cranioplasty were identified by: 1) a history of an infected, failed, previous cranial reconstruction, 2) inadequate scalp or skin to cover the external surface of an anticipated skeletal vault reconstruction, 3) the communication of adjacent paranasal sinuses with the epidural space, 4) the presence of an avascular dead space posterior to the reconstructed cranium. These potentially negative influences were systematically addressed as part of the surgical routine in autogenous split skull cranioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7673439     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80001-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  9 in total

Review 1.  A review of reconstructive materials for use in craniofacial surgery bone fixation materials, bone substitutes, and distractors.

Authors:  James Tait Goodrich; Adam L Sandler; Oren Tepper
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Cranioplasty in Children with Split Rib Graft.

Authors:  N K Sahoo; I D Roy; H Rangarajan
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

3.  Split Calvarial Grafting for Closure of Large Cranial Defects: The Ideal Option?

Authors:  Priya Jeyaraj
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-02-09

4.  [Reconstruction of the frontal sinus with a calvarium split galea periosteum transplant after inflammatory complications].

Authors:  T Grundmann; W Kehrl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Neumann; Kevin Kevenhoerster
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

6.  Microsurgical reconstruction of large, locally advanced cutaneous malignancy of the head and neck.

Authors:  Joseph L Hill; Brian Rinker
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-20

7.  Low-cost customized cranioplasty using a 3D digital printing model: a case report.

Authors:  Abel De La Peña; Javier De La Peña-Brambila; Juan Pérez-De La Torre; Miguel Ochoa; Guillermo J Gallardo
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2018-04-12

8.  Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Cranial Deformity in Hyperostotic Convexity Meningioma.

Authors:  Yamini Nandini; Swapna Bettanapalya Venkatesh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

9.  Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals.

Authors:  Dave Chamo; Bilal Msallem; Neha Sharma; Soheila Aghlmandi; Christoph Kunz; Florian M Thieringer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.