Literature DB >> 7672668

Informed consent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

S P Pereira1, S H Hussaini, M L Wilkinson.   

Abstract

Informed consent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy requires that the patient understands the nature of, and reason for, the proposed procedure, and that he or she is given adequate time to deliberate and ask questions. In a prospective study, 200 outpatients completed questionnaires immediately before, and one day after, endoscopy, which assessed satisfaction with information provided by: (a) the referring doctor, (b) a standard information sheet sent out two to four weeks before endoscopy, and (c) the endoscopist. The first 100 patients were asked to read and sign a standard consent form immediately before the endoscopy. In the second 100 patients, a new endoscopy consent form that was simpler and easier to read than the standard form was sent out with the information sheet. Patients were directed to sign the new consent form before arriving at the unit only if they had no further questions. Overall, the indication for the endoscopy, and how it would be done, were explained clearly by the referring doctor in 79% and 68% of cases, respectively. Of the first 100 patients, only 54% had read the standard consent form in the endoscopy unit before signing it. In contrast, of the second 100 patients, the new form sent with the information sheet was read by 95%, and signed by 88% before coming to the unit. Furthermore, 84% found the new form easier to read and understand than the standard form. In our unit, roughly one quarter of patients referred for endoscopy are not adequately informed about the procedure. In contrast with the standard consent form, a simple endoscopy consent form sent out with the information sheet is preferred by most patients, and safeguards against patients undergoing endoscopy without informed consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7672668      PMCID: PMC1382789          DOI: 10.1136/gut.37.1.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  9 in total

1.  Consenting patients.

Authors:  Tony Delamothe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-15

2.  How readable are practice leaflets?

Authors:  T Albert; S Chadwick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-21

3.  Information for patients.

Authors:  T Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-21

4.  Are patient consent forms for research protocols easy to read?

Authors:  K A Priestley; C Campbell; C B Valentine; D M Denison; N P Buller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-21

5.  Patients who were given information sheets have better postoperative recall of information.

Authors:  P J Lewis; L O'Keefe; S Adcock
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1991-06

6.  Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy- a survey of patients' impressions.

Authors:  B Walker; M J Smith
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  A simple technique for increasing cancer patients knowledge of informed consent to treatment.

Authors:  G Morrow; J Gootnick; A Schmale
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Information requirements and sedation preferences of patients undergoing endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  C S Probert; V Jayanthi; J Quinn; J F Mayberry
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Endoscopy: throat spray or sedation?

Authors:  S Pereira; S H Hussaini; P J Hanson; M L Wilkinson; G E Sladen
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct
  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Issues of consent in colonoscopy: if a patient says 'stop' should we continue?

Authors:  B Ward; S Shah; P Kirwan; J F Mayberry
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Postal consent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  H A Shepherd; D Bowman; B Hancock; J Anglin; D Hewett
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Combined written and oral information prior to gastrointestinal endoscopy compared with oral information alone: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Christian Felley; Thomas V Perneger; Isabelle Goulet; Catherine Rouillard; Nadereh Azar-Pey; Gian Dorta; Antoine Hadengue; Jean-Louis Frossard
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  The Effect of Information About Gynecological Examination on the Anxiety Level of Women Applying to Gynecology Clinics: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Kahraman Ulker; Yuksel Kivrak
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  Informed consent in diagnostic radiology practice: Where do we stand?

Authors:  Akshay D Baheti; Meenakshi H Thakur; Bhavin Jankharia
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

6.  A novel metadata management model to capture consent for record linkage in longitudinal research studies.

Authors:  Christiana McMahon; Spiros Denaxas
Journal:  Inform Health Soc Care       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.439

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.