Literature DB >> 7671526

Ethylene oxide sterilization impairs allograft incorporation in a conduction chamber.

K Thorén1, P Aspenberg.   

Abstract

Bone allograft processing often includes treatment with hydrogen peroxide for protein denaturation and sterilization by irradiation or ethylene oxide. The effect of these treatments on the osteoconductive properties of the graft was tested by measuring the new bone ingrowth distance into processed cancellous bone grafts in rats. Forty graft pairs were taken from rat tibias, and were frozen, defatted in chloroform-methanol, and dried. In addition, 1 graft of each pair was treated with 2% hydrogen peroxide, 2.5 Mrad irradiation, or by a Steri-Vac hospital ethylene oxide chamber. The grafts were placed in bone conduction chambers and implanted in rat tibias. Six weeks after implantation, the chambers were emptied, and the new bone ingrowth distance and scintimetric activity were measured. Ethylene oxide treatment impaired the new bone ingrowth distance by 68% and reduced the scintimetric activity by 51%. Another 10 defatted grafts, which had been ethylene oxide treated together with the grafts for implantation, were analyzed for levels of residual ethylene oxide, ethylene chlorohydrin, and ethylene glycol. All the measured residuals were below the detection limit of 20 parts per million, which was below the level recommended by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Ethylene oxide sterilization was more deleterious for bone allografts than expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7671526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

Review 1.  Adverse reactions and events related to musculoskeletal allografts: reviewed by the World Health Organisation Project NOTIFY.

Authors:  M Hinsenkamp; L Muylle; T Eastlund; D Fehily; L Noël; D M Strong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Gamma Radiation Sterilization Reduces the High-cycle Fatigue Life of Allograft Bone.

Authors:  Anowarul Islam; Katherine Chapin; Emily Moore; Joel Ford; Clare Rimnac; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Bone allografting: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Harish V Kurup; Prabhakar Rao; Dilip K Patro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Quantification of growth factors in allogenic bone grafts extracted with three different methods.

Authors:  B Wildemann; A Kadow-Romacker; A Pruss; N P Haas; G Schmidmaier
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Comparative biomechanical and microstructural analysis of native versus peracetic acid-ethanol treated cancellous bone graft.

Authors:  Juliane Rauh; Florian Despang; Jorgen Baas; Cornelia Liebers; Axel Pruss; Michael Gelinsky; Klaus-Peter Günther; Maik Stiehler
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Measurement of hepatitis B virus DNA in fresh versus processed dentin from chronically infected patients.

Authors:  Inwoong Um; Sungweon Choi; Youngkyun Kim; Kangmi Pang; Jongho Lee; Minsun Lee; Bongju Kim
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  BONE BANKS.

Authors:  Paulo Gilberto Cimbalista de Alencar; Inácio Facó Ventura Vieira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.