Literature DB >> 7671473

Revision knee arthroplasty. The limits of press fit medullary fixation.

K G Vince1, W Long.   

Abstract

Nonlinked (nonhinged) but constrained knee prostheses have been used with some success, usually by fully cementing narrow fixed stems in the medullary canal. Modular press fit stems augment fixation and limit cement to the cut bone surface. Forty-four revision knee arthroplasties were followed prospectively for 2 to 6 years. Thirty-one were reconstructed with posterior stabilized implants and 13 required constrained (condylar) articulations. Of these 13, 2 have been revised for loosening and another has radiographic evidence of impending loosening. All 3 were in patients who had reimplantations after a 2-stage protocol for infection, and none failed sooner than 3 years after surgery. No evidence of recurrent sepsis was observed. The press fit technique with limited cement use may not provide adequate fixation for the constrained condylar implant, especially when bone quality is poor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7671473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  13 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Beckmann; C Lüring; R Springorum; F X Köck; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The role of offset stems in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Giovanni Balato; Vincenzo Franceschini
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  Acute locking in revision total knee arthroplasty due to disengagement of the locking screw.

Authors:  J B Nadkarni; D G Carden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years.

Authors:  Alexander P Sah; Sanjai Shukla; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changyao Wang; Tilman Pfitzner; Philipp von Roth; Hermann O Mayr; Michael Sostheim; Robert Hube
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with varus-valgus constrained prosthesis versus posterior stabilized prosthesis.

Authors:  Joon Kyu Lee; Sahnghoon Lee; Dongwook Kim; Sang Min Lee; Jak Jang; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Revision after early aseptic failures in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sérgio Rocha Piedade; Alban Pinaroli; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Are cementless stems more durable than cemented stems in two-stage revisions of infected total knee arthroplasties?

Authors:  Paul K Edwards; Thomas K Fehring; William G Hamilton; Brett Perricelli; Walter B Beaver; Susan M Odum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The use of cement in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alvin Ck Tan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-04

10.  Results of a Second-generation Constrained Condylar Prosthesis in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Mean 5.5-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Chen-Yi Ye; De-Ting Xue; Shuai Jiang; Rong-Xin He
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.