Literature DB >> 7671368

Role of right atrial endocardial structures as barriers to conduction during human type I atrial flutter. Activation and entrainment mapping guided by intracardiac echocardiography.

J E Olgin1, J M Kalman, A P Fitzpatrick, M D Lesh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of barriers in atrial flutter has been demonstrated in animals. We used activation and entrainment mapping, guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), to determine whether the crista terminalis (CT) and eustachian ridge (ER) are barriers to conduction during typical atrial flutter in humans. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In eight patients, ICE was used to guide the placement of 20-pole and octapolar catheters along the CT and interatrial septum and a roving catheter to nine sites: just posterior (1) and anterior (2) to the CT along the lateral right atrium, at the fossa ovalis (3), and just posterior and anterior to the ER at the low posterolateral (4 and 5), low posterior (6 and 7), and low posteromedial (8 and 9) right atrium. Entrainment was performed, and each site was considered within the flutter circuit if the postpacing interval-flutter cycle length (PPI-FCL) and the stimulus time-activation time (stim time-act time) were < 10 msec. Split potentials were recorded along the CT with components activated in a low-to-high pattern and a high-to-low pattern. Conduction times, as percentage of FCL, were significantly different at sites on either side of the CT and ER: site 1 (33 +/- 13%) and site 2 (43 +/- 12%) (P = .02), site 4 (48 +/- 24%) and site 5 (75 +/- 8.9%) (P = .02), and site 6 (22 +/- 10%) and site 7 (82 +/- 5.3%) (P = .0009). During entrainment, no surface fusion was observed at sites 5, 7, or 9. The PPI-FCL and stim time-act time were not significantly different than 0 at sites 2, 7, 5, or 9, indicating that they were within the flutter circuit, whereas sites 1, 3, 4, and 6 were not.
CONCLUSIONS: ICE enabled the correlation of functional electrophysiological properties with specific anatomic landmarks, identifying the CT and ER as barriers to conduction during human atrial flutter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7671368     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.7.1839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  56 in total

1.  Apparent bidirectional conduction block following radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter.

Authors:  R F Quintos; T Barakat; A Mecca; B Olshansky
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Electroanatomic magnetic mapping during ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.

Authors:  R F Coyne; M Deely; C D Gottlieb; F E Marchlinski; D J Callans
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  [Cardiology update. I: Electrophysiology].

Authors:  P Weismüller; H J Trappe
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-01-15

Review 4.  Treatment of atrial flutter.

Authors:  A L Waldo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Intracardiac echocardiography guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  Ravinder Batra; Mohan Nair; Manoj Kumar; Jagdish Mohan; Prasad Shah; Upkar Kaul; Ramesh Arora
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Transseptal left heart catheterisation guided by intracardiac echocardiography.

Authors:  T Szili-Torok; G Kimman; D Theuns; J Res; J R Roelandt; L J Jordaens
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  The utility of intracardiac echocardiography in interventional electrophysiology.

Authors:  L M Epstein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Electrophysiological determinant for induction of isthmus dependent counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter in humans.

Authors:  J L Lin; L P Lai; L J Lin; Y Z Tseng; W P Lien; S K Huang
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  P-wave abnormality predicts recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hanney Gonna; Mark Michael Gallagher; Xiao Hua Guo; Yee Guan Yap; Katerina Hnatkova; A John Camm
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 1.468

10.  The terminal crest: morphological features relevant to electrophysiology.

Authors:  D Sánchez-Quintana; R H Anderson; J A Cabrera; V Climent; R Martin; J Farré; S Y Ho
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.