Literature DB >> 7665665

Comparison of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis for molecular subtyping of Cryptococcus neoformans. The Cryplococcal Disease Active Surveillance Group.

M E Brandt1, L C Hutwagner, R J Kuykendall, R W Pinner.   

Abstract

We evaluated multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MEE) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for their usefulness in subtyping 344 Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolates obtained from four U.S. metropolitan areas in 1992 to 1994. MEE and RAPD with five primers both discriminated between the two varieties of C. neofromans. MEE divided C. neoformans var. neoformans isolates into 15 enzyme electrophoretic subtypes (ETs) arranged in three complexes. The predominant ET 1 complex contained 10 ETs, with isolates from 70% of patients in 1 ET. RAPD with five primers further sorted this predominant ET into 19 subtypes, with 60% of isolates sorting into three RAPD types. The ET 8 MEE complex, containing three ETs, could not be divided further by RAPD. The ET 7 complex (two ETs) included isolates from all serotype AD patients. Although both MEE and RAPD identified isolates of C. neoformans var. gattii, neither distinguished between serotypes B and C. These results showed that the two C. neoformans varieties could be identified by MEE or RAPD profile as well as by biochemical methods. RAPD improved the discriminatory power of MEE for isolates within the ET 1 complex but with other ETs offered little additional sensitivity over MEE and was less sensitive than MEE with isolates of C. neoformans var. gattii. This information will be useful in identifying particular environmental sources of disease-causing exposures, in seeking clusters of cases, and in determining whether an infecting strain changes over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7665665      PMCID: PMC228292          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1890-1895.1995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  31 in total

1.  Development of DNA probes for early diagnosis and epidemiological study of cryptococcosis in AIDS patients.

Authors:  I Polacheck; G Lebens; J B Hicks
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.

Authors:  J G Williams; A R Kubelik; K J Livak; J A Rafalski; S V Tingey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Population genetics of pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  R K Selander; J M Musser; D A Caugant; M N Gilmour; T S Whittam
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Fungal infections in AIDS. Cryptococcosis.

Authors:  I H Grant; D Armstrong
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.982

5.  RAPD (arbitrary primer) PCR is more sensitive than multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for distinguishing related bacterial strains.

Authors:  G Wang; T S Whittam; C M Berg; D E Berg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Genetic structure of populations of Legionella pneumophila.

Authors:  R K Selander; R M McKinney; T S Whittam; W F Bibb; D J Brenner; F S Nolte; P E Pattison
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Polysaccharide antigens of the capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  R Cherniak; J B Sundstrom
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Genetic characterization of six parasitic protozoa: parity between random-primer DNA typing and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis.

Authors:  M Tibayrenc; K Neubauer; C Barnabé; F Guerrini; D Skarecky; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Multilocus enzyme typing of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  M E Brandt; S L Bragg; R W Pinner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans capsular glucuronoxylomannan polysaccharide with monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  F Todaro-Luck; E Reiss; R Cherniak; L Kaufman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  29 in total

1.  Monoclonal antibody 13F1 produces annular immunofluorescence patterns on Cryptococcus neoformans serotype AD isolates.

Authors:  W Cleare; M E Brandt; A Casadevall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  The ins and outs of DNA fingerprinting the infectious fungi.

Authors:  D R Soll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Molecular epidemiology of Cryptococcus neoformans in Brazil and the United States: evidence for both local genetic differences and a global clonal population structure.

Authors:  S P Franzot; J S Hamdan; B P Currie; A Casadevall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Serotyping of Cryptococcus neoformans strains isolated from clinical specimens in Thailand and their susceptibility to various antifungal agents.

Authors:  N Poonwan; Y Mikami; S Poosuwan; J Boon-Long; N Mekha; M Kusum; K Yazawa; R Tanaka; K Nishimura; K Konyama
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Electrophoretic karyotypes of C. neoformans serotype A recovered from Thai patients with AIDS.

Authors:  Puriya Ngamwongsatit; Samaniya Sukroongreung; Churairatana Nilakul; Virapong Prachayasittikul; Srisurang Tantimavanich
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.574

6.  Multilocus sequence typing reveals three genetic subpopulations of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii (serotype A), including a unique population in Botswana.

Authors:  Anastasia P Litvintseva; Rameshwari Thakur; Rytas Vilgalys; Thomas G Mitchell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Trends in antifungal drug susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates in the United States: 1992 to 1994 and 1996 to 1998.

Authors:  M E Brandt; M A Pfaller; R A Hajjeh; R J Hamill; P G Pappas; A L Reingold; D Rimland; D W Warnock
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Genetic multilocus studies of different strains of Cryptococcus neoformans: taxonomy and genetic structure.

Authors:  S Bertout; F Renaud; D Swinne; M Mallié; J M Bastide
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Molecular subtype distribution of Cryptococcus neoformans in four areas of the United States. Cryptococcal Disease Active Surveillance Group.

Authors:  M E Brandt; L C Hutwagner; L A Klug; W S Baughman; D Rimland; E A Graviss; R J Hamill; C Thomas; P G Pappas; A L Reingold; R W Pinner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evidence of sexual recombination among Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A isolates in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Anastasia P Litvintseva; Robert E Marra; Kirsten Nielsen; Joseph Heitman; Rytas Vilgalys; Thomas G Mitchell
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2003-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.