Literature DB >> 11600357

Trends in antifungal drug susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates in the United States: 1992 to 1994 and 1996 to 1998.

M E Brandt1, M A Pfaller, R A Hajjeh, R J Hamill, P G Pappas, A L Reingold, D Rimland, D W Warnock.   

Abstract

The antifungal drug susceptibilities of two collections of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates obtained through active laboratory-based surveillance from 1992 to 1994 (368 isolates) and 1996 to 1998 (364 isolates) were determined. The MICs of fluconazole, itraconazole, and flucytosine were determined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth microdilution method; amphotericin B MICs were determined by the E-test. Our results showed that the MIC ranges, the MICs at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC(50)s), and the MIC(90)s of these four antifungal agents did not change from 1992 to 1998. In addition, very small numbers of isolates showed elevated MICs suggestive of in vitro resistance. The MICs of amphotericin B were elevated (>or=2 microg/ml) for 2 isolates, and the MICs of flucytosine were elevated (>or=32 microg/ml) for 14 isolates. Among the azoles, the fluconazole MIC was elevated (>or=64 microg/ml) for 8 isolates and the itraconazole MIC (>or=1 microg/ml) was elevated for 45 isolates. Analysis of 172 serial isolates from 71 patients showed little change in the fluconazole MIC over time. For isolates from 58 patients (82% of serial cases) there was either no change or a twofold change in the fluconazole MIC. In contrast, for isolates from seven patients (12% of serial cases) the increase in the MIC was at least fourfold. For isolates from another patient there was a 32-fold decrease in the fluconazole MIC over a 1-month period. We conclude that in vitro resistance to antifungal agents remains uncommon in C. neoformans and has not significantly changed with time during the past decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11600357      PMCID: PMC90783          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3065-3069.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  22 in total

1.  Azole drug resistance as a cause of clinical relapse in AIDS patients with cryptococcal meningitis.

Authors:  H D Birley; E M Johnson; P McDonald; C Parry; P B Carey; D W Warnock
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.359

2.  Increased fluconazole resistance of Cryptococcus neoformans isolated from a patient with AIDS and recurrent meningitis.

Authors:  A Paugam; J Dupouy-Camet; P Blanche; J P Gangneux; C Tourte-Schaefer; D Sicard
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Correlation of fluconazole MICs with clinical outcome in cryptococcal infection.

Authors:  A I Aller; E Martin-Mazuelos; F Lozano; J Gomez-Mateos; L Steele-Moore; W J Holloway; M J Gutiérrez; F J Recio; A Espinel-Ingroff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Correlation of in vitro azole susceptibility with in vivo response in a murine model of cryptococcal meningitis.

Authors:  J D Velez; R Allendoerfer; M Luther; M G Rinaldi; J R Graybill
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts.

Authors:  R A Fromtling; J N Galgiani; M A Pfaller; A Espinel-Ingroff; K F Bartizal; M S Bartlett; B A Body; C Frey; G Hall; G D Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cryptococcal meningitis in patients with AIDS.

Authors:  W E Dismukes
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Comparison of D0870 and fluconazole in the treatment of murine cryptococcal meningitis.

Authors:  A L Correa; G Velez; M Albert; M Luther; M G Rinaldi; J R Graybill
Journal:  J Med Vet Mycol       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

Review 8.  Cryptococcal meningitis and AIDS.

Authors:  W G Powderly
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Comparison of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis for molecular subtyping of Cryptococcus neoformans. The Cryplococcal Disease Active Surveillance Group.

Authors:  M E Brandt; L C Hutwagner; R J Kuykendall; R W Pinner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Two-site comparison of broth microdilution and semisolid agar dilution methods for susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans in three media.

Authors:  E Anaissie; R Shawar; V Paetznick; L G Ensign; Z Witte; M LaRocco
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  41 in total

1.  Voriconazole, combined with amphotericin B, in the treatment for pulmonary cryptococcosis caused by C. neoformans (serotype A) in mice with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID).

Authors:  Eriques Gonçalves Silva; Claudete Rodrigues Paula; Francisco de Assis Baroni; Walderez Gambale
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 2.  Antifungal agents: in vitro susceptibility testing, pharmacodynamics, and prospects for combination therapy.

Authors:  A H Groll; H Kolve
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Phenotypic switching and its implications for the pathogenesis of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Neena Jain; Abraham Guerrero; Bettina C Fries
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Combination of amphotericin B with flucytosine is active in vitro against flucytosine-resistant isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Patrick Schwarz; Guilhem Janbon; Françoise Dromer; Olivier Lortholary; Eric Dannaoui
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Effects of antifungal interventions on the outcome of experimental infections with phenotypic switch variants of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Bettina C Fries; Emily Cook; Xiabo Wang; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Efficacy of amphotericin B in combination with flucytosine against flucytosine-susceptible or flucytosine-resistant isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans during disseminated murine cryptococcosis.

Authors:  Patrick Schwarz; Françoise Dromer; Olivier Lortholary; Eric Dannaoui
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of results of voriconazole disk diffusion testing for Candida species with results from a central reference laboratory in the ARTEMIS global antifungal surveillance program.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; L Boyken; S A Messer; S Tendolkar; R J Hollis; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Trends in antifungal drug susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates obtained through population-based surveillance in South Africa in 2002-2003 and 2007-2008.

Authors:  Nelesh P Govender; Jaymati Patel; Marelize van Wyk; Tom M Chiller; Shawn R Lockhart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Roles of Three Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii Efflux Pump-Coding Genes in Response to Drug Treatment.

Authors:  Miwha Chang; Edward Sionov; Ami Khanal Lamichhane; Kyung J Kwon-Chung; Yun C Chang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  In vitro activity of amphotericin B, fluconazole and voriconazole against 162 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from Africa and Cambodia.

Authors:  J Chandenier; K D Adou-Bryn; C Douchet; B Sar; M Kombila; D Swinne; M Thérizol-Ferly; Y Buisson; D Richard-Lenoble
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.