Literature DB >> 7665044

Specialist and general practice views on routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in general practice.

E Grunfeld1, D Mant, M P Vessey, R Fitzpatrick.   

Abstract

The practice of routinely following-up breast cancer in hospital clinics is of widespread concern: studies have shown that it is not an effective way of detecting recurrent disease and it places great strain on cancer services which are already overstretched. A general practice centred system of routine follow-up may be a solution to this problem in those countries which have a strong primary care base. Such a system would have other benefits such as continuity of care for the patient. The objective of this study was to determine the views of general practitioners and specialists on follow-up of patients with breast cancer in remission, with special emphasis on their views on the transfer of routine follow-up from the hospital to general practice. A postal questionnaire survey of British breast cancer specialists (response rate 77.0%) and a personal interview survey of British general practitioners (response rate 81.8%) were conducted. The results show that British general practitioners are willing to take on greater responsibility for the routine follow-up care of their patients with breast cancer. However, there was frequently a mis-match between specialists' and general practitioners' views on this subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7665044     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/12.1.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  30 in total

1.  Willingness to follow breast cancer. Survey of family physicians.

Authors:  A Worster; M J Bass; M L Wood
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

3.  Cancer survivorship: a challenge for primary care physicians.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Follow-up care for young adult survivors of cancer: lessons from pediatrics.

Authors:  Christine Eiser; Kate Absolom; Diana Greenfield; John Snowden; Robert Coleman; Barry Hancock; Helena Davies
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Use of survivorship care plans in the United States: associations with survivorship care.

Authors:  Laura P Forsythe; Carla Parry; Catherine M Alfano; Erin E Kent; Corinne R Leach; David A Haggstrom; Patricia A Ganz; Noreen Aziz; Julia H Rowland
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The impact of primary care physicians on follow-up care of underserved breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Yihang Liu; Allison L Diamant; Amardeep Thind
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

7.  Cancer survivorship care for the general internist: have we paved the way for a smoother transition?

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Sheldon Greenfield
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial.

Authors:  E Grunfeld; D Mant; P Yudkin; R Adewuyi-Dalton; D Cole; J Stewart; R Fitzpatrick; M Vessey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-14

9.  First two years of a follow-up breast clinic led by a nurse practitioner.

Authors:  J J Earnshaw; Y Stephenson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Patient satisfaction with GP-led melanoma follow-up: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P Murchie; M C Nicolson; P C Hannaford; E A Raja; A J Lee; N C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.