Literature DB >> 7664902

A prognostic value of CA 19-9 but not of CEA in patients with gastric cancer.

M Victorzon1, C Haglund, J Lundin, P J Roberts.   

Abstract

The diagnostic and prognostic value of tumour markers CEA and CA 19-9 was studied in patients with gastric cancer. Pre-operative serum concentrations of CEA and CA 19-9 were determined in 100 gastric cancer patients and in 77 patients with relevant benign diseases. The sensitivity of both CEA (cut-off level 3 ng/ml) and CA 19-9 (cut-off level 37 U/ml) for gastric cancer was 30%. The specificities were 73% and 87%, respectively. There was a significant difference in prognosis, for both CEA (cut-off level 3 ng/ml, P < 0.05) and CA 19-9 (cut-off level 37 U/ml, P < 0.01), between patients with high vs low pre-operative serum levels. The overall 5-year survival was 26% and that of patients with low marker levels was 30% (CEA) and 35% (CA 19-9) compared with 15% (CEA) and 0% (CA 19-9) for patients with high marker levels. To evaluate whether the high vs low serum marker level was an independent prognostic factor, the patients were compared within the same stage of disease. There was still a significant difference in 5-year survival in stages II, III and IV between patients with high vs low pre-operative serum levels for CA 19-9 (P < 0.05), but not for CEA. In stage I, no differences in survival could be found for either marker. In conclusion, high pre-operative serum levels of CEA seem to predict higher stage of disease, whereas CA 19-9 might have an independent prognostic value in patients within the stage of II, III or IV gastric cancer. The diagnostic value of both CEA and CA 19-9 is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7664902     DOI: 10.1016/s0748-7983(95)92450-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  13 in total

1.  Normal carcinoembryonic antigen indicates benefit from perioperative chemotherapy to gastric carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Ying-Bo Chen; Yuan-Fang Li; Xing-Yu Feng; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Xiu-Hong Yuan; Chao-Nan Qian
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Prognostic value of carbohydrate tumor markers and inflammation-based markers in metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Yang Yang; Ya-Ping Zhang; Zhengyun Zou; Xiaoping Qian; Baorui Liu; Jia Wei
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Monitoring of peri-distal gastrectomy carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level in gastric juice and its significance.

Authors:  A-Man Xu; Lei Huang; Wen-Xiu Han; Zhi-Jian Wei
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-01-15

4.  Clinical significance and usefulness of soluble heparin binding-epidermal growth factor in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hye Won Chung; Hoon Young Kong; Jong-Baeck Lim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  IMMUNOBIOLOGICAL MONITORING OF VARIOUS GASTROINTESTINAL AND PRIMARY HEPATIC MALIGNANCIES.

Authors:  G S Chopra; K B Mishra; L S Vohra; M P Jaiprakash; J R Bhardwaj
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

Review 6.  Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Tamaki Noie; Manabu Ohashi; Koji Oba; Yutaka Takahashi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 7.  Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Carbohydrate Antigen 72-4 in Gastric Cancer: Is the Old Band Still Playing?

Authors:  Andrey Iskrenov Kotzev; Peter Vassilev Draganov
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2018-04-24

8.  The prognostic significance of pretreatment serum CEA levels in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis including 14651 patients.

Authors:  Kai Deng; Li Yang; Bing Hu; Hao Wu; Hong Zhu; Chengwei Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Use of autoantibodies against tumor-associated antigens as serum biomarkers for primary screening of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yingji Jin; Seung Cheol Kim; Hyoung Jin Kim; Woong Ju; Yun Hwan Kim; Hong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-01

10.  Serum high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) is closely associated with the clinical and pathologic features of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hye Won Chung; Sang-Guk Lee; Heejung Kim; Duck Jin Hong; Jae Bock Chung; David Stroncek; Jong-Baeck Lim
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.