Literature DB >> 7663790

Peak expiratory flow monitoring is not a reliable method for establishing the diagnosis of occupational asthma.

S Quirce1, G Contreras, A Dybuncio, M Chan-Yeung.   

Abstract

This is a study of the reliability of peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring using a portable computerized peak flow meter, the VMX Mini-log, in 17 subjects referred for suspected occupational asthma. Subjects were requested to monitor their PEF six times daily using the VMX Mini-Log for 2 wk at work and at least 10 d away from work. They were unaware that their readings were stored by the flow meter in addition to the digital readout. Four subjects (22%) were unable to complete the monitoring. The results recorded by the subjects were compared with the results recorded by the VMX. Of those who completed the monitoring, only 55.3% of the records were completely accurate in terms of the value and the timing of the measurements, 23.3% were inaccurate either in terms of the recorded value or of the timing of the measurement, and the remainder were fabricated results (not recorded by the Mini-Log). Our results suggest that PEF monitoring using ordinary peak flow meters for assessment of work-relatedness of asthma has limitations and is not reliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7663790     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.3.7663790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  11 in total

1.  Detection of workers sensitised to high molecular weight allergens: a diagnostic study in laboratory animal workers.

Authors:  E Meijer; D E Grobbee; D Heederik
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Interpretation of occupational peak flow records: level of agreement between expert clinicians and Oasys-2.

Authors:  D R Baldwin; P Gannon; P Bright; D T Newton; A Robertson; K Venables; B Graneek; R D Barker; A Cartier; J-L Malo; M Wilsher; C F A Pantin; P S Burge
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  Occupational lung disease. 8. The diagnosis of occupational asthma from serial measurements of lung function at and away from work.

Authors:  P Bright; P S Burge
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Review of Diagnostic Challenges in Occupational Asthma.

Authors:  Jacques A Pralong; Andre Cartier
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 5.  Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group.

Authors:  L P Boulet; A Becker; D Bérubé; R Beveridge; P Ernst
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-11-30       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Prevalence and host determinants of occupational bronchial asthma in animal shelter workers.

Authors:  Anna Krakowiak; Patrycja Krawczyk; Bogdan Szulc; Marta Wiszniewska; Monika Kowalczyk; Jolanta Walusiak; Cezary Pałczyński
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma.

Authors:  P J Nicholson; P Cullinan; A J Newman Taylor; P S Burge; C Boyle
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  New-onset adult asthma in relation to damp and moldy workplaces.

Authors:  Kirsi Karvala; Elina Toskala; Ritva Luukkonen; Sanna Lappalainen; Jukka Uitti; Henrik Nordman
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 9.  Occupational asthma: a review.

Authors:  L J Lombardo; J R Balmes
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Pulmonary Function Testing in Work-Related Asthma: An Overview from Spirometry to Specific Inhalation Challenge.

Authors:  Mathias Poussel; Isabelle Thaon; Emmanuelle Penven; Angelica I Tiotiu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.