OBJECTIVE: To assess the interobserver variability between two observers from different echocardiographic laboratories. DESIGN: Two observers reviewed video recordings blinded to the other's diagnosis. In part I (n = 88), they determined interobserver variability for spontaneous echo contrast, left atrial thrombi, and appendage thrombi. No diagnostic criteria for thrombi were defined. In part II (n = 85), diagnostic criteria for thrombi were defined. RESULTS: Part I: Both observers agreed in diagnosing spontaneous echo contrast in 97%, left atrial thrombi in 90%, left atrial appendage thrombi in 94%. Part II: With predefined criteria no disagreement occurred in diagnosing left atrial thrombi. In the diagnosis of left atrial appendage thrombi both observers agreed in 89%. The mean diameters of the 10 thrombi on which the observers agreed were greater than of the nine appendage thrombi on which they disagreed. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of spontaneous echo contrast is low. Defined criteria decrease interobserver variability for left atrial and appendage thrombi, although one third of the thrombi diagnosed by one observer were not confirmed by the other. Interobserver variability is high in the assessment of small structures (< 15 mm) within the left atrial appendage.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the interobserver variability between two observers from different echocardiographic laboratories. DESIGN: Two observers reviewed video recordings blinded to the other's diagnosis. In part I (n = 88), they determined interobserver variability for spontaneous echo contrast, left atrial thrombi, and appendage thrombi. No diagnostic criteria for thrombi were defined. In part II (n = 85), diagnostic criteria for thrombi were defined. RESULTS: Part I: Both observers agreed in diagnosing spontaneous echo contrast in 97%, left atrial thrombi in 90%, left atrial appendage thrombi in 94%. Part II: With predefined criteria no disagreement occurred in diagnosing left atrial thrombi. In the diagnosis of left atrial appendage thrombi both observers agreed in 89%. The mean diameters of the 10 thrombi on which the observers agreed were greater than of the nine appendage thrombi on which they disagreed. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of spontaneous echo contrast is low. Defined criteria decrease interobserver variability for left atrial and appendage thrombi, although one third of the thrombi diagnosed by one observer were not confirmed by the other. Interobserver variability is high in the assessment of small structures (< 15 mm) within the left atrial appendage.
Authors: W G Daniel; U Nellessen; E Schröder; B Nonnast-Daniel; P Bednarski; P Nikutta; P R Lichtlen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1988-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J D Olson; I F Goldenberg; W Pedersen; D Brandt; M Kane; J A Daniel; R R Nelson; M R Mooney; H W Lange Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1992 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: R Erbel; H Stern; W Ehrenthal; G Schreiner; N Treese; G Krämer; M Thelen; P Schweizer; J Meyer Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 1986-06 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: J J Hwang; J J Chen; S C Lin; Y Z Tseng; P Kuan; W P Lien; F Y Lin; S H Chu; C R Hung; S W How Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1993-09-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Chenni S Sriram; Javier E Banchs; Talal Moukabary; Raman Moradkhan; Mario D Gonzalez Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2015-05-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: H Omran; W Jung; R Rabahieh; D MacCarter; S Illien; B Rang; A Hagendorff; R Schimpf; B Lüderitz Journal: Heart Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Tomás F Cianciulli; María C Saccheri; Jorge A Lax; Alejandra M Bermann; Ricardo J Méndez; Juan E Guerra; Héctor J Redruello; Adriana N Dorelle; Horacio A Prezioso; Luis A Vidal Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Renate B Schnabel; Stephan Camen; Fabian Knebel; Andreas Hagendorff; Udo Bavendiek; Michael Böhm; Wolfram Doehner; Matthias Endres; Klaus Gröschel; Andreas Goette; Hagen B Huttner; Christoph Jensen; Paulus Kirchhof; Grigorios Korosoglou; Ulrich Laufs; Jan Liman; Caroline Morbach; Darius Günther Nabavi; Tobias Neumann-Haefelin; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Sven Poli; Timolaos Rizos; Andreas Rolf; Joachim Röther; Wolf Rüdiger Schäbitz; Thorsten Steiner; Götz Thomalla; Rolf Wachter; Karl Georg Haeusler Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 5.460