Literature DB >> 19184521

Right and left atrial appendage function in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm.

Tomás F Cianciulli1, María C Saccheri, Jorge A Lax, Alejandra M Bermann, Ricardo J Méndez, Juan E Guerra, Héctor J Redruello, Adriana N Dorelle, Horacio A Prezioso, Luis A Vidal.   

Abstract

Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) is generally used for the assessment of ventricular function, and to a lesser extent, to evaluate the left atrial appendage (LAA). In the present study, we used TDI to analyze the contractile function of the right atrial appendage (RAA). The aim of this study was a comprehensive evaluation of RAA and LAA contractile function in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm. A total of 69 patients were assessed: group 1 (23 patients with severe MS, 38 +/- 11 years, 20 women), group 2 (23 patients with mild MS, 39 +/- 12 years, 19 women) and group 3 (23 healthy subjects, 42 +/- 14 years, 16 women). Multiplane transesophageal echo was performed in all patients. The RAA was visualized at 130 degrees and the LAA at 0 degrees . TDI sample volume was placed in the tip of both atrial appendages, with an ultrasound beam angle < 10 degrees . Flow velocities and myocardial velocities were measured. The presence of thrombus and/or spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) was assessed. TDI showed in normal subjects, myocardial contraction velocities in RAA similar to that of the LAA (21.8 +/- 4.2 vs. 20.1 +/- 4 cm/s, respectively, P = NS). In patients with MS, myocardial velocities in both atrial appendages were significantly lower than in normal subjects (RAA: 17.4 +/- 5.1 vs. 21.8 +/- 4.2 cm/s, respectively, P < 0.01, LAA: 9 +/- 5.1 vs. 20.1 +/- 4 cm/s, respectively, P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis showed a correlation between the impairment of systolic function of both appendages, pulmonary arterial pressure, valve area and transmitral gradient. Of the 46 patients with MS, patients with intense SEC had lower flow and myocardial velocities in the LAA than patients without SEC (16 +/- 5 vs. 50 +/- 3 cm/s, 6 +/- 2 vs. 10.6 +/- 5.6 cm/s, respectively, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). In healthy subjects, myocardial contraction velocities in both appendages were similar. Patients with MS and sinus rhythm had contractile dysfunction of both appendages, shown by the decrease in myocardial velocities and related to the increase in atrial afterload. Both appendages exhibited a relation between contractile dysfunction and the presence of SEC, but dysfunction was less marked in the RAA, which might explain the lower prevalence of thrombi in the RAA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184521     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-009-9430-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  26 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for chamber quantification.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack Shanewise; Scott Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William Stewart
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-02-02

2.  [Assessment of the reliability of clinical findings: the intraclass correlation coefficient].

Authors:  L Prieto; R Lamarca; A Casado
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  1998-02-07       Impact factor: 1.725

3.  Multiplane transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of left atrial appendage anatomy and function.

Authors:  S K Chan; J P Kannam; P S Douglas; W J Manning
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements.

Authors:  D J Sahn; A DeMaria; J Kisslo; A Weyman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Incidence of left atrial thrombi in patients in sinus rhythm and with a recent neurologic deficit.

Authors:  H Omran; B Rang; H Schmidt; S Illien; R Schimpf; D Maccarter; R Kubini; G Von Der Recke; K Tiemann; H Becher; B Lüderitz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Clinical implications of left atrial appendage function: its influence on thrombus formation.

Authors:  Y H Li; L P Lai; K G Shyu; J J Hwang; H M Ma; Y L Ko; P Kuan; W P Lien
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Left atrial appendage function in mitral stenosis: is a group in sinus rhythm at risk of thromboembolism?

Authors:  M A Daimee; A L Salama; G Cherian; N J Hayat; T N Sugathan
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Regional left atrial stasis during atrial fibrillation and flutter: determinants and relation to stroke.

Authors:  B K Shively; E A Gelgand; M H Crawford
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Smoke-like echo in the left atrial cavity in mitral valve disease: its features and significance.

Authors:  S Beppu; Y Nimura; H Sakakibara; S Nagata; Y D Park; S Izumi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Left atrial appendage function in patients with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm.

Authors:  Z Gölbaşi; D Ciçek; A Canbay; O Uçar; H Bayol; S Aydogdu
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2002-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Structural Comparison between the Right and Left Atrial Appendages Using Multidetector Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Koichi Shinoda; Shogo Hayashi; Daisuke Fukuoka; Ryo Torii; Tsuneo Watanabe; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.