Literature DB >> 7661944

Subclavian venous catheterization: greater success rate for less experienced operators using ultrasound guidance.

E Gualtieri1, S A Deppe, M E Sipperly, D R Thompson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if ultrasound guidance can be safely performed and improve success rates for subclavian venous catheterization performed by less experienced operators.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study.
SETTING: Twenty-bed trauma-surgical-medical intensive care unit in a 524-bed, community, tertiary care, teaching hospital. PATIENTS: After the decision for central venous cannulation was made, informed consent was obtained, and less experienced operators then attempted to insert subclavian catheters in 33 critical care patients.
INTERVENTIONS: Catheter placements were attempted, either by landmark technique, ultrasound technique, or by landmark attempts with ultrasound salvage. Catheterization techniques to be used were randomized using a random number table.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-three placement procedures were attempted in 33 patients. One procedure was excluded from data analysis. Successful catheterizations, occurrence rates of complications, number of attempts, and number of catheter kits used were recorded. In the analysis, 52 catheterization procedures were studied. Twelve (44%) catheters were successfully placed from 27 attempts using the landmark technique vs. 23 (92%) successful catheterizations during 25 ultrasound procedures (p = .0003). Fifteen failed landmark technique attempts had ultrasound salvage attempted, with 12 (80%) catheters successfully inserted. Eleven complications (minor) occurred in 27 attempts of subclavian venous catheterization using conventional landmark technique vs. one complication (minor) in 25 attempts of subclavian venous catheterization with ultrasound guidance (p = .002). There were no major complications in either group. The landmark group required an average of 2.5 venipunctures and 1.4 catheter kits per attempted catheterization. The ultrasound group required an average of 1.4 venipuncture attempts and 1.0 insertion kit. The statistical significance in differences in groups for the average number of venipunctures was p = .0007 and average number of kits used was p = .0003.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of subclavian venous catheterization performed by less experienced operators. There were no major complications in either group. Ultrasound guidance is usually successful in allowing performance of subclavian venous catheterizations when landmark techniques fail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7661944     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199504000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  41 in total

1.  Progress in central venous access?

Authors:  César O Freytes
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Should ultrasound guidance be used for central venous catheterisation in the emergency department?

Authors:  P Atkinson; A Boyle; S Robinson; G Campbell-Hewson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Pre-procedure duplex ultrasonography to assist cephalic vein isolation in pacemaker and defibrillator implantation.

Authors:  Jan-Yow Chen; Kuan-Cheng Chang; Yu-Chin Lin; Hsiang-Tai Chou; Jui-Sung Hung
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Risk factors for acute adverse events during ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Daniel Theodoro; Missy Krauss; Marin Kollef; Bradley Evanoff
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Use of hand-held ultrasonography to confirm the correct placement of a central venous catheter tip.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Ohta; Fumio Tsujimoto; Yasuo Nakajima; Akihiro Ohyama; Maho Sakamoto; Akiko Kishino; Kazumitsu Hamasuna; Giichiro Ohno; Atsushi Tsugu
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Pneumothorax as a complication of central venous catheter insertion.

Authors:  Nikolaos Tsotsolis; Katerina Tsirgogianni; Ioannis Kioumis; Georgia Pitsiou; Sofia Baka; Antonis Papaiwannou; Anastasia Karavergou; Aggeliki Rapti; Georgia Trakada; Nikolaos Katsikogiannis; Kosmas Tsakiridis; Ilias Karapantzos; Chrysanthi Karapantzou; Nikos Barbetakis; Athanasios Zissimopoulos; Ivan Kuhajda; Dejan Andjelkovic; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis; Paul Zarogoulidis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-03

7.  Retrospective outcome analysis of rates and types of complications after 8654 minimally invasive radiological port implantations via the subclavian vein without ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Karolin J Paprottka; Jana Voelklein; Tobias Waggershauser; Maximilian F Reiser; Philipp M Paprottka
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  [Ultrasound-guided central venous access in adults and children: Procedure and pathological findings].

Authors:  P Scheiermann; F H Seeger; R Breitkreutz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Impact of ultrasonography on central venous catheter insertion in intensive care.

Authors:  Gopal B Palepu; Juneja Deven; M Subrahmanyam; S Mohan
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep

10.  Ultrasound confirmation of guidewire position may eliminate accidental arterial dilatation during central venous cannulation.

Authors:  Lawrence M Gillman; Michael Blaivas; Jason Lord; Azzam Al-Kadi; Andrew W Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.