OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical validity of the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) in detecting patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). BACKGROUND: The DRS is widely used to evaluate cognitive functioning in older adults. Adequate normative data are unavailable; studies addressing the clinical validity of the DRS are limited by small sample sizes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Administered the DRS to 254 outpatients with DAT and 105 healthy elderly subjects. Performed (1) multiple regressions of demographic factors on the DRS and its subscales; (2) derivation of optimal DRS cutoff scores using receiver operating characteristic curves; (3) double cross-validation with stepwise logistic regressions; and (4) application of results to a community-dwelling sample. RESULTS: Age- and education-adjusted DRS scores were computed. The optimal DRS cutoff score for DAT of 129 or less revealed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 97%. The logistic regressions resulted in a combination of the Memory and Initiation/Perseveration subscales that correctly classified 98% of all subjects, 92% of a subsample of 76 patients with mild DAT, and 100% of the 51 patients with autopsy-confirmed DAT. The resultant equation was then applied to a community-dwelling sample (238 healthy elderly subjects and 44 patients with DAT): 91% of patients and 93% of normal subjects were correctly classified. Of an additional 77 individuals with questionable DAT, 43 were classified as demented and 34 were classified as nondemented. CONCLUSIONS: The DRS is a clinically valid psychometric test for the detection of DAT. The Memory and Initiation/Perseveration subscales are its best discriminative indexes for an abbreviated version.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical validity of the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) in detecting patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). BACKGROUND: The DRS is widely used to evaluate cognitive functioning in older adults. Adequate normative data are unavailable; studies addressing the clinical validity of the DRS are limited by small sample sizes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Administered the DRS to 254 outpatients with DAT and 105 healthy elderly subjects. Performed (1) multiple regressions of demographic factors on the DRS and its subscales; (2) derivation of optimal DRS cutoff scores using receiver operating characteristic curves; (3) double cross-validation with stepwise logistic regressions; and (4) application of results to a community-dwelling sample. RESULTS: Age- and education-adjusted DRS scores were computed. The optimal DRS cutoff score for DAT of 129 or less revealed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 97%. The logistic regressions resulted in a combination of the Memory and Initiation/Perseveration subscales that correctly classified 98% of all subjects, 92% of a subsample of 76 patients with mild DAT, and 100% of the 51 patients with autopsy-confirmed DAT. The resultant equation was then applied to a community-dwelling sample (238 healthy elderly subjects and 44 patients with DAT): 91% of patients and 93% of normal subjects were correctly classified. Of an additional 77 individuals with questionable DAT, 43 were classified as demented and 34 were classified as nondemented. CONCLUSIONS: The DRS is a clinically valid psychometric test for the detection of DAT. The Memory and Initiation/Perseveration subscales are its best discriminative indexes for an abbreviated version.
Authors: Gregory M Pontone; Justin Palanci; James R Williams; Susan Spear Bassett Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: K Warner Schaie; Grace I L Caskie; Andrew J Revell; Sherry L Willis; Alfred W Kaszniak; Linda Teri Journal: Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn Date: 2005-09
Authors: Lindsay R Clark; Dawn M Schiehser; Gali H Weissberger; David P Salmon; Dean C Delis; Mark W Bondi Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Lindsay R Clark; Nikki H Stricker; David J Libon; Lisa Delano-Wood; David P Salmon; Dean C Delis; Mark W Bondi Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Eric M Fine; Dean C Delis; Spencer R Wetter; Mark W Jacobson; Amy J Jak; Carrie R McDonald; Jodessa C Braga; Leon J Thal; David P Salmon; Mark W Bondi Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 4.105