Literature DB >> 24170170

Effect of knowledge of APOE genotype on subjective and objective memory performance in healthy older adults.

Tara T Lineweaver, Mark W Bondi, Douglas Galasko, David P Salmon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The knowledge that one carries the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele risk factor for Alzheimer's disease was recently found to have little short-term psychological risk. The authors investigated the impact of knowledge of carrying the risk allele on subjective ratings of memory and objective memory test performance of older adults.
METHOD: Using a nested case-control design, the authors administered objective verbal and visual memory tests and self-rating scales of memory function to 144 cognitively normal older adults (ages 52-89) with known APOE genotype who knew (ε4+, N=25; ε4-, N=49) or did not know (ε4+, N=25; ε4-, N=45) their genotype and genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease prior to neuropsychological evaluation.
RESULTS: Significant genotype-by-disclosure interaction effects were observed on several memory rating scales and tests of immediate and delayed verbal recall. Older adults who knew their ε4+ genotype judged their memory more harshly and performed worse on an objective verbal memory test than did ε4+ adults who did not know. In contrast, older adults who knew their ε4- genotype judged their memory more positively than did ε4- adults who did not know, but these groups did not differ in objective memory test performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Informing older adults that they have an APOE genotype associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease can have adverse consequences on their perception of their memory abilities and their performance on objective memory tests. The patient's knowledge of his or her genotype and risk of Alzheimer's disease should be considered when evaluating cognition in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24170170      PMCID: PMC4037144          DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12121590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  20 in total

1.  Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Reisa A Sperling; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; David A Bennett; Suzanne Craft; Anne M Fagan; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Clifford R Jack; Jeffrey Kaye; Thomas J Montine; Denise C Park; Eric M Reiman; Christopher C Rowe; Eric Siemers; Yaakov Stern; Kristine Yaffe; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Marcelle Morrison-Bogorad; Molly V Wagster; Creighton H Phelps
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 21.566

2.  Recursive processes in self-affirmation: intervening to close the minority achievement gap.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Cohen; Julio Garcia; Valerie Purdie-Vaughns; Nancy Apfel; Patricia Brzustoski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The nature of cognitive complaints in healthy older adults with and without objective memory decline.

Authors:  J Weaver Cargin; A Collie; C Masters; P Maruff
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.475

4.  Effect of genetic testing for risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Rosalie A Kane; Robert L Kane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping.

Authors:  B Levy
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-12

6.  Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: a classroom study of values affirmation.

Authors:  Akira Miyake; Lauren E Kost-Smith; Noah D Finkelstein; Steven J Pollock; Geoffrey L Cohen; Tiffany A Ito
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts; L Adrienne Cupples; Norman R Relkin; Peter J Whitehouse; Tamsen Brown; Susan LaRusse Eckert; Melissa Butson; A Dessa Sadovnick; Kimberly A Quaid; Clara Chen; Robert Cook-Deegan; Lindsay A Farrer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Differential memory test sensitivity for diagnosing amnestic mild cognitive impairment and predicting conversion to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Laura A Rabin; Nadia Paré; Andrew J Saykin; Michael J Brown; Heather A Wishart; Laura A Flashman; Robert B Santulli
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2009-04-07

9.  Mild cognitive impairment: applicability of research criteria in a memory clinic and characterization of cognitive profile.

Authors:  Suvarna Alladi; Robert Arnold; Joanna Mitchell; Peter J Nestor; John R Hodges
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  46 in total

1.  Subjective cognitive complaints contribute to misdiagnosis of mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Emily C Edmonds; Lisa Delano-Wood; Douglas R Galasko; David P Salmon; Mark W Bondi
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.892

2.  Learning one's genetic risk changes physiology independent of actual genetic risk.

Authors:  Bradley P Turnwald; J Parker Goyer; Danielle Z Boles; Amy Silder; Scott L Delp; Alia J Crum
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-12-10

3.  On What We Have Learned and Still Need to Learn about the Psychosocial Impacts of Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Erik Parens; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Susceptibility of the conventional criteria for mild cognitive impairment to false-positive diagnostic errors.

Authors:  Emily C Edmonds; Lisa Delano-Wood; Lindsay R Clark; Amy J Jak; Daniel A Nation; Carrie R McDonald; David J Libon; Rhoda Au; Douglas Galasko; David P Salmon; Mark W Bondi
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  Different concepts and models of information for family-relevant genetic findings: comparison and ethical analysis.

Authors:  Christian Lenk; Debora Frommeld
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-08

Review 6.  Subjective Cognitive Complaints and Objective Cognitive Function in Aging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Cross-Sectional Findings.

Authors:  Bridget Burmester; Janet Leathem; Paul Merrick
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Attitudes toward Potential Participant Registries.

Authors:  Joshua D Grill; Andrew Holbrook; Aimee Pierce; Dan Hoang; Daniel L Gillen
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

8.  Clinical implications of APOE genotyping for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) risk estimation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Victoria S Marshe; Ilona Gorbovskaya; Sarah Kanji; Maxine Kish; Daniel J Müller
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  The fiduciary relationship model for managing clinical genomic "incidental" findings.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 10.  Ethics of genetic and biomarker test disclosures in neurodegenerative disease prevention trials.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Jason Karlawish; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.