Literature DB >> 7661655

Sexual orientation and performance on sexually dimorphic motor tasks.

J A Hall1, D Kimura.   

Abstract

Performance of homosexual and heterosexual men and women on two motor tasks which reliably demonstrate sex differences in opposite directions was examined. A Throw-to-Target Task and the Purdue Pegboard were administered to undergraduate students matched for age and program of study. A two-way ANOVA (Sex x Sexual Orientation) of the Throw data showed a significant interaction, F(1, 90) = 16.22, p < or = 0.001, and a trend for an effect of sex, F(1, 90) = 3.72, p < 0.06. Heterosexual men outperformed heterosexual women, whereas gay men threw less accurately and lesbians tended to throw more accurately than their heterosexual counterparts. Differences in sports history or hand strength did not account for these effects. Analysis of the Pegboard scores found no interaction or main effect of sexual orientation, but the effect of sex was significant, F(1,63) = 7.01, p < or = 0.02. Regardless of sexual orientation, women outperformed men and this difference remained significant even when a measure of finger size was partialed out. This study provides new evidence suggesting an association between sexual orientation and motor-performance profiles. As with cognitive tasks, the motor-performance profiles of homosexuals are composites of some male-typical and some female-typical abilities. To the extent that sociological factors have been controlled, the study suggests that both sexual orientation and motor/cognitive predispositions may have early biological contributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7661655     DOI: 10.1007/bf01541855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  18 in total

1.  An enlarged suprachiasmatic nucleus in homosexual men.

Authors:  D F Swaab; M A Hofman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1990-12-24       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory.

Authors:  C L Williams; A M Barnett; W H Meck
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Sexual orientation and cognitive abilities.

Authors:  G E Tuttle; R C Pillard
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1991-06

4.  Sexual orientation and visuo-spatial ability.

Authors:  G Sanders; L Ross-Field
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  A linkage between DNA markers on the X chromosome and male sexual orientation.

Authors:  D H Hamer; S Hu; V L Magnuson; N Hu; A M Pattatucci
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  On the organization of partner preference behavior in female Wistar rats.

Authors:  T Brand; A K Slob
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1991-03

7.  Neuroendocrine responses to exogenous estrogen: no differences between heterosexual and homosexual men.

Authors:  S E Hendricks; B Graber; J F Rodriguez-Sierra
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.905

8.  Neuroendocrine response to estrogen and sexual orientation.

Authors:  B A Gladue; R Green; R E Hellman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men.

Authors:  S LeVay
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Marked sex differences on a fine motor skill task disappear when finger size is used as covariate.

Authors:  M Peters; P Servos; R Day
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1990-02
View more
  10 in total

1.  Subjective visual vertical in vestibular disorders measured with the bucket test.

Authors:  Helen S Cohen; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Sex-related differences in motor learning and performance.

Authors:  Pablo Moreno-Briseño; Rosalinda Díaz; Aurelio Campos-Romo; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.759

3.  Gender-Based Occupational Segregation and Sex Differences in Sensory, Motor, and Spatial Aptitudes.

Authors:  Michael Baker; Kirsten Cornelson
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2018-10

Review 4.  Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 5.  The genetics of sex differences in brain and behavior.

Authors:  Tuck C Ngun; Negar Ghahramani; Francisco J Sánchez; Sven Bocklandt; Eric Vilain
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 8.606

6.  Men and women differ in the neural basis of handwriting.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Fred Tam; Simon J Graham; Guochen Sun; Junjun Li; Chanyuan Gu; Ran Tao; Nizhuan Wang; Hong-Yan Bi; Zhentao Zuo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Male-typical visuospatial functioning in gynephilic girls with gender dysphoria - organizational and activational effects of testosterone.

Authors:  Sarah M Burke; Baudewijntje P C Kreukels; Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis; Dick J Veltman; Daniel T Klink; Julie Bakker
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.186

8.  Is homosexuality a paraphilia? The evidence for and against.

Authors:  James M Cantor
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2012-02

9.  Visual- spatial capacity: gender and sport differences in young volleyball and tennis athletes and non-athletes.

Authors:  Angela Notarnicola; Giuseppe Maccagnano; Vito Pesce; Silvio Tafuri; Grazia Novielli; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-01-21

10.  Sexual Orientation and Cognitive Ability: A Multivariate Meta-Analytic Follow-Up.

Authors:  Yin Xu; Sam Norton; Qazi Rahman
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-01-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.