Literature DB >> 7661151

24-hour shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain using various adhesion promoters.

P W Major1, J R Koehler, K E Manning.   

Abstract

Clinically, orthodontists are often faced with the difficulties of bonding to porcelain crowns, veneers, or bridges. Traditional methods of dealing with this are often time-consuming and generally esthetically unacceptable to patients. Current interest involves the use of organosilane primers with or without NTG-GMA and BPDM resins to aid in chemically bonding porcelain with traditional orthodontic adhesives. This study compared the bond strength of three types of adhesion promoters: Ormco Porcelain Primer (OR) (Ormco Corp., Glendora, Calif.), All-Bond2 (AB2) (Bisco Dental Products, Inc., Itasca, Ill.), and Scotchprime Ceramic Primer (SP) (3M, St. Paul, Minn.) with two orthodontic adhesives: Phase II (Reliance, Inc., Itasca, Ill.) and Rely-a-bond (Reliance, Inc., Itasca, Ill.). Eighty ceramometal samples were fabricated and hydrated for 1 week in distilled water before bonding. Next, the samples were etched with 2.5 % HF acid for 90 seconds, rinsed and upper central incisor metal orthodontic brackets were bonded with the various primers and adhesives. After 24 hours they were sheared off with an MTS machine at at rate of 0.5 mm/min, and the bond strength was measured. The mean shear bond strengths (MPa) with Phase II were as follows; Control 0.44 (sigma = 0.22), AB2 8.40 (sigma = 3.61), OR 13.31 (sigma = 5.79), SP 13.53 (sigma = 3.34). With Rely-a-bond, the shear bond strengths were Control 0.41 (sigma = 0.67), AB2 4.34 (sigma = 1.88), OR 9.73 (sigma = 4.58), and SP 12.40 (sigma = 3.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7661151     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70028-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effect of four surface conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of metal bracket to porcelain surface.

Authors:  Hooman Zarif Najafi; Morteza Oshagh; Sepideh Torkan; Bahareh Yousefipour; Raha Salehi
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Assessment of Bond Strength between Metal Brackets and Non-Glazed Ceramic in Different Surface Treatment Methods.

Authors:  Ms Ahmad Akhoundi; M Rahmati Kamel; T Hooshmand; I Harririan; Mj Kharazi Fard; H Noroozi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-06-30

3.  Tensile bond strength of metal bracket bonding to glazed ceramic surfaces with different surface conditionings.

Authors:  Ms Ahmad Akhoundi; M Rahmati Kamel; Sh Mahmood Hashemi; M Imani
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2011-12-20

4.  The effect of various primers on shear bond strength of zirconia ceramic and resin composite.

Authors:  Sasiwimol Sanohkan; Boonlert Kukiattrakoon; Narongrit Larpboonphol; Taewalit Sae-Yib; Thibet Jampa; Satawat Manoppan
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-11

5.  Assessment the Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets to CAD/CAM Nanoceramic Composite and Interpenetrating Network Composite after Different Surface Treatments.

Authors:  Mustafa Mehmet Özarslan; Özlem Üstün; Ulviye Sebnem Buyukkaplan; Çağatay Barutcigil; Nurullah Türker; Kubilay Barutcigil
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.