Literature DB >> 7661143

Comparison of different bonding materials for laser debonding.

H Mimura1, T Deguchi, A Obata, T Yamagishi, M Ito.   

Abstract

The laser-aided removal of ceramic brackets from enamel surfaces was compared between two different adhesives. The selected bonding materials were Bis-GMA composite resin and 4-META MMA resin. Debonding forces were measured as the shear bond strength, perpendicular to the brackets. Debonding force, debonding time, total illuminated laser energy, and Modified Adhesive Remnant Index were discussed. Laser illumination was very effective for debonding in both resin groups. Enamel fracture was not observed in either laser illuminated groups, whereas two teeth were cracked in the Bis-GMA control group. For MMA resin, debonding force was sufficiently decreased at 3 watts output, whereas 7 watts output was needed for Bis-GMA resin samples. Total illuminated energies until the removal of the brackets were statistically lower in the MMA groups than in the Bis-GMA groups. Laser-focused adhesives tended to be removed with the brackets in the Bis-GMA groups, whereas they tended to remain on the tooth surface in the MMA groups. We concluded that debonding MMA resin with a laser is safer than debonding Bis-GMA resin with a laser.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7661143     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70020-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  14 in total

1.  Ceramic bracket debonding with ytterbium fiber laser.

Authors:  Ayşe Sena Kabaş Sarp; Murat Gülsoy
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Effects of different application durations of ER:YAG laser on intrapulpal temperature change during debonding.

Authors:  Didem Nalbantgil; M Oguz Oztoprak; Murat Tozlu; Tülin Arun
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Evaluation of the effects of CO2 laser on debonding of orthodontics porcelain brackets vs. the conventional method.

Authors:  Azita Tehranchi; Reza Fekrazad; Morvarid Zafar; Behnam Eslami; Katayoun A M Kalhori; Norbert Gutknecht
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  CO2 laser as auxiliary in the debonding of ceramic brackets.

Authors:  Rodrigo Teixeira Macri; Fabrício Augusto de Lima; Luciano Bachmann; Rodrigo Galo; Fábio Lourenço Romano; Maria Cristina Borsatto; Mírian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Use of a DPSS Er:YAG laser for the selective removal of composite from tooth surfaces.

Authors:  William A Fried; Kenneth H Chan; Cynthia L Darling; Daniel Fried
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 6.  Laser-Aided Ceramic Bracket Debonding: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Rezvaneh Ghazanfari; Hanieh Nokhbatolfoghahaei; Marzieh Alikhasi
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-07

7.  Shear bond strength and enamel fracture behavior of ceramic brackets Fascination® and Fascination®2.

Authors:  Robert Gittner; Ralf Müller-Hartwich; Sylvia Engel; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Rapid debonding of polycrystalline ceramic orthodontic brackets with an Er:YAG laser: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ambili Roselina Mundethu; Norbert Gutknecht; Rene Franzen
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Effect of Er:YAG laser on debonding strength of laminate veneers.

Authors:  Ufuk Iseri; Mehmet Oguz Oztoprak; Zeynep Ozkurt; Ender Kazazoglu; Tulin Arun
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-01

10.  Selective removal of dental composite with a diode-pumped Er:YAG laser.

Authors:  William A Fried; Kenneth H Chan; Cynthia L Darling; Daniel Fried
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-02-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.