Literature DB >> 20725757

Evaluation of the effects of CO2 laser on debonding of orthodontics porcelain brackets vs. the conventional method.

Azita Tehranchi1, Reza Fekrazad, Morvarid Zafar, Behnam Eslami, Katayoun A M Kalhori, Norbert Gutknecht.   

Abstract

Debonding of ceramic brackets due to their high bond strength and low fracture toughness is one of the clinician's complications. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of a laser on shear bond strength, site of debonding, and ARI index during debonding of ceramic brackets and then compare it to the conventional method used for this procedure. Thirty polycrystalline alumina (G & H Series, Germany) brackets were bonded to 30 intact extracted first and second maxillary premolars and stored in a 1% thymol solution. A chemically cured orthodontic composite resin (No-mix, Unitek, USA) was used for bonding the brackets to the enamel surface on all teeth. All brackets were positioned 4 mm from the incisal edge of the teeth with an orthodontic bracket-positioning device. Then the teeth with bonded brackets were embedded in auto-polymerized polymethylmethacrylate (2.2.3 cm) blocks using a special device to make their slots horizontally parallel. These 30 teeth were then divided into two subgroups: control or no-lased (n = 15) and super pulse CO(2) laser (n = 15). To characterize the peak of SBS in two groups, we used an Instron machine while its blade was moving at a constant speed of 1 mm/min. For evaluating the site of debonding and the adhesive remnant index (ARI index), a light microscope and the Photoshop program were used. Means and standard deviations of the SBS in two subgroups shows that in the control group, the teeth have definitely higher values in comparison to the experimental group. The results of the two groups drew no substantial differences with respect to the surface of debonding, which was mostly within the adhesive. However, observing the results of ARI presented a significant distinction between the control and experimental group. This index denoted that the debonding site in the control group was closer to the enamel adhesive interface and, consequently, the rate of enamel damage in this group would be greater. The present study shows that a CO(2) laser has the potential to replace the conventional method for debonding ceramic brackets due to less debonding force and more adhesive remnant index on the tooth surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20725757     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-010-0820-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  14 in total

1.  Super pulse CO2 laser for bracket bonding and debonding.

Authors:  A Obata; T Tsumura; K Niwa; Y Ashizawa; T Deguchi; M Ito
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ezz Azzeh; Paul J Feldon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Ceramic bracket debonding with the carbon dioxide laser.

Authors:  J L Rickabaugh; R D Marangoni; K K McCaffrey
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  In vitro comparison of debonding force and intrapulpal temperature changes during ceramic orthodontic bracket removal using a carbon dioxide laser.

Authors:  T Ma; R D Marangoni; W Flint
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives.

Authors:  S E Bishara; D E Fehr; J R Jakobsen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets.

Authors:  P G Jost-Brinkmann; H Stein; R R Miethke; M Nakata
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets.

Authors:  K Strobl; T L Bahns; L Willham; S E Bishara; W C Stwalley
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Fracture toughness and surface cracks--the key to understanding ceramic brackets.

Authors:  G E Scott
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  R M Tocchio; P T Williams; F J Mayer; K G Standing
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets. An in vitro study.

Authors:  E M Brouns; P M Schopf; B Kocjancic
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  13 in total

1.  CO2 laser debonding of a ceramic bracket bonded with orthodontic adhesive containing thermal expansion microcapsules.

Authors:  Ayano Saito; Yasuhiro Namura; Keitaro Isokawa; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Effects of different application durations of scanning laser method on debonding strength of laminate veneers.

Authors:  Mehmet Oguz Oztoprak; Murat Tozlu; Ufuk Iseri; Feyza Ulkur; Tulin Arun
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  CO2 laser as auxiliary in the debonding of ceramic brackets.

Authors:  Rodrigo Teixeira Macri; Fabrício Augusto de Lima; Luciano Bachmann; Rodrigo Galo; Fábio Lourenço Romano; Maria Cristina Borsatto; Mírian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Laser-Aided Ceramic Bracket Debonding: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Rezvaneh Ghazanfari; Hanieh Nokhbatolfoghahaei; Marzieh Alikhasi
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-07

5.  Does ultra-pulse CO(2) laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets?

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Farzin Heravi; Reza Fekrazad; Fahimeh Farzanegan; Samaneh Nakhaei
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  The Effect of Fractional CO2 Laser Irradiation on Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Feldspathic Porcelain.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Alireza Boruziniat; Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour; Mehrnoosh Alirezaei
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-20

7.  CO2 laser conditioning of porcelain surfaces for bonding metal orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Farzin Heravi; Mohsen Hosseini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Different modes of diode laser irradiation: effects on enamel surface and intrapulpal temperature at debonding.

Authors:  Soghra Yassaei; Hosseinagha Aghili; Zahra Ebrahimi-Nik
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2018-09-30

9.  Does the CO2 laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?

Authors:  Fábio Lourenço Romano; Giovanna Pessoti; Rodrigo Galo; Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva; Marília Pacífico Lucisano; Maria Cristina Borsatto; Paulo Nelson-Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

10.  Evaluation of the effect of diode laser for debonding ceramic brackets on nanomechanical properties of enamel.

Authors:  Neda Sinaee; Sasan Salahi; Mostafa Sheikhi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.